Originally Posted by Unregistered

whereby the relevancy depends on alignment with whether you were experienced in agile, microservices, those 2016ish onwards kind of technology, basically any skillset with strong alignment to the needs of the cap centres under product engineering group => high relevancy. that's why those shiny new grads in TAP get to G so fast. those tt have skillsets and experience dealing with monolithic systems from 10, 20 yrs ago, still dealing with man hours counting instead of velocity points vendoring - typically those in SVC - sorry too bad not agile, not bold, not aligned with "new age" way, so discount on experience