Today 01:44 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
but if we look at the "bad", the younger officers have it much worse then those in their 40s and older. the older KPs are also able to escape some of the modern demands, by arrowing their subordinates to do it |
|
Today 01:10 PM | ||
Unregistered | OP here...typo in my post..what I meant was CEP | |
Today 01:01 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
This isn’t really a bad thing? Most jobs have evolved, and the demands of teaching have too. Teaching your own IP subject is only one part of a modern teacher’s work, there’s many other things that are important and the system has evolved to recognise that. |
|
Today 12:58 PM | ||
Unregistered | because of the slow promotion? any plans for next job? | |
Today 12:17 PM | ||
Unregistered | i hope that u now don’t inflict suffering on others. takes a lot not to most KPs are vile, at least hypocritical if not downright evil, it’s how the system works. ****ing hypocrites given the profession. am sure many will burn in hell | |
Today 12:09 PM | ||
Unregistered | Yes. 9th year geo 3 here. Throwing letter on 31 March | |
Today 11:43 AM | ||
Unregistered | anyone throwing in letter soon? | |
Today 11:35 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
2) If they choose to retain their HOD appointment and switch school, they'll be forced to work and show their worth in the new environment. For those who aren't able to do so, a number will end up choosing to step down. Overall, even if it doesn't solve 100% of the 'problem' you have outlined, it's quite likely to reduce it… no? |
|
Today 11:17 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
And history does matter. Some ROs now may not even be teaching as well as his/her subordinate, but in the past they managed to rise up so fast to their current position now. The bar has been raised so much already. If we zoom out and look at the bigger picture now, a high performing GEO3 will need to have a portfolio that covers almost everything (IP and non IP related), while specializing in some of his/her strengths (leadership role e.g. IC-ship or being extremely skilled in something). Most of such officers' lives revolve only around work. We can already see so many SEOs and GEO5s (can also guess their ages already) remaining single or childless by choice due to the demand of work. Gotta sacrifice something to climb. Those able to juggle work and everything else are either rare, or have some sort of external support (rich or free spouse, family etc) There is also that element of luck of having a good RO who fights for you and SLs who are fair. In a human centric type of industry, your progression is a lot more complex than other sectors like tech or finance. Right here, it is a combination of arbitrary numbers, proper connections and finally, luck. To put this in a more crude way, the complexity and demand of this industry now ensures a constant flow of officers resigning, remaining stagnant, being recruited and finally, being promoted, no? Bell curve model for fairness, no? |
|
Today 10:32 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Need some advice here. I left MOE before covid and returned during covid. I recently entertained thoughts of opening posting to HQ as i felt that my school has no plans to groom me to become a KP. But recently I got promoted to GEO5. This is completely unexpected as I just got promoted to GEO4 in 2022, 1.5yrs after returning to service. Which leads me to my question, should i stay on since the school seems to be ranking me well and recognizing my efforts and contribution? but no one sound me out on whether i am keen to be a KP |
|
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |