15-01-2018 12:40 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
"it's usage has continually increased since the 1950." It is usage has continually increased since the 1950? Not the person you've been arguing with, but your grammar is hilarious. |
|
15-09-2016 11:45 AM | ||
Unregistered | These fkn lawyers are way too free. | |
15-09-2016 11:15 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Lest he provides another detailed summary of word usage for "loser" or "wanker". |
|
15-09-2016 09:37 AM | ||
Unregistered | Please don't feed the wanker | |
14-09-2016 11:24 PM | ||
Unregistered | Actually you're a loser. Now that's a word for which usage has continually increased since the 1960s too. | |
14-09-2016 11:12 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
|
|
12-09-2016 02:41 PM | ||
Unregistered |
That's a good comeback. I checked the Google statistics on the word 'twat' and to my amazement, it's usage has continually increased since the 1950. So it seems that I'm really a dullard for initially not knowing the word twat. Lol. Nice comeback pal. The initial commentor should learn from you. Well done. |
|
10-09-2016 10:13 AM | ||
Unregistered | Please don't feed the twat | |
10-09-2016 09:10 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
It's like you're talking to yourself. Brilliant. |
|
10-09-2016 12:37 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Lol. Your comeback will have more impact if it's obvious, rather than one that requires me to understand why what I said before requires legal training. Unless, I'm the dullard. Here's an idea. Maybe you could have said that my defense was about 'correct' English, not about 'better' English. I'll wake up tomorrow expecting to hear another comeback from you. |
|
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |