Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Lawyer Salary

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: Lawyer Salary Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 12:19 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
In terms of branding, breadth of modules, well-oiled mechanism, etc, SMU over SUSS for sure.
Hows SUSS law lecturers like?
Yesterday 06:01 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Eh, while im not too sure how RnT splits/names their teams, i'm pretty sure com lit is like a super general classification with many many partners.

I think i'll just say that i was super impressed with one of their partners, Paul Tan. Some years ago, he came up with a seemingly insane argument on one our our matters (which we eventually lost). So, respect.

He also had a dignified way of treating his opposing counsels, which i find to be rare (not in RnT per se, just in general).
Hi Paul...times must be hard when you have to advertise here.
Yesterday 04:45 PM
Unregistered In terms of branding, breadth of modules, well-oiled mechanism, etc, SMU over SUSS for sure.
Yesterday 04:26 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
heard that SUSS's curricula is intense and crazy difficult because they have to prove that they are on par with SMU and NUS. =/
Hows the branding like? And the faculty?
Some of the top law professors seem to be from SMU rather than SUSS.
So you suggesting smu is a better option?
Cannot get into NUS. But open offers from SMU and SUSS
Yesterday 03:30 PM
Unregistered heard that SUSS's curricula is intense and crazy difficult because they have to prove that they are on par with SMU and NUS. =/
Yesterday 01:35 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Too much over-simplification here from people going on about how legal work is "not a necessity" and easily cut when companies are not doing well.

Being a lawyer means you're providing advisory services. And in many cases, legal advice is absolutely necessary if you're planning to go ahead with virtually any major commercial transaction (see M&A, financing, restructuring) or litigation. As such, we are a protected industry that is relatively stable in a recession compared to many other professions (I am not saying everything is fine, note the "relatively"). Now, clearly the economy has slowed meaning many underlying transactions have stalled or cut entirely, and obviously you don't need legal advice if there is no deal or you don't have the money to hire a lawyer to sue, and SG doesn't allow hiring on contingency. That's the fallout in certain firms in certain departments you are observing. But this doesn't mean that legal services aren't still absolutely essential in many ways.

Certain departments in many firms are still doing well - thriving, in fact, because of the economic downturn. It's also a matter of economics. M&A has slowed locally, but you can see it's actually sped up in many parts of the US and Europe. This has to do with structural differences in the companies.

Anyone who just parrots the "the economy is doing bad so lawyers aren't needed" trope clearly lacks the intellectual nuance to be a good lawyer, but then again what was I expecting from an internet forum.

If your whole point is just about lawyers being essential in times of recession then it is valid but is just missing the points. The issue here is whether law practices, as a business, can survive a recession like this.
Yesterday 01:35 PM
Unregistered Should I choose between smu law and suss law?
In terms of quality of faculty, quality of teaching, quality of course materials, quality of branding and reputation? And career prospects?
Im interested in crim or family. But I heard smu does that pretty well
Yesterday 11:50 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Chambers ranking is actually quite representative of the standard of work for local corporate departments.
Is it fair to say WP is most balanced firm in terms of disputes and corporate work.

A&G - corporate tier 1, Disputes tier 2
R&t - corporate tier 2, Disputes tier 1
D&N - corporate tier 3, Disputes tier 1
WP - corporate tier 1, Disputes tier 1
Yesterday 10:59 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
He made EP at 34, pretty ridiculous feat.
O really? I'm not part of the big4 circle so don't really know much of the gossip.
Can only speak from experience dealing with them.
Yesterday 10:39 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Eh, while im not too sure how RnT splits/names their teams, i'm pretty sure com lit is like a super general classification with many many partners.

I think i'll just say that i was super impressed with one of their partners, Paul Tan. Some years ago, he came up with a seemingly insane argument on one our our matters (which we eventually lost). So, respect.

He also had a dignified way of treating his opposing counsels, which i find to be rare (not in RnT per se, just in general).
He made EP at 34, pretty ridiculous feat.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2