| Yesterday 09:43 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddy
This would be an in-house role in a Fortune 500 company. I understand that is would vary from company to company by I just wanted to get a better understanding of the range out there.
|
It really varies as you already, a good range for in-inhouse should be S$15-20k
If you’re the same poster, I saw from the other new thread you started that you are currently a legally qualified privacy manager in a Fortune 500 who feels you are underpaid. Isn’t it easier to find out directly from your company what the range would be? Through ears to the ground or whatever
|
| Yesterday 08:58 PM |
| Unregistered |
A&O NQ up to £150k liao
|
| Yesterday 08:36 PM |
| Bigdaddy |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Shouldn’t you first provide some context, are u asking range if you specialise in law firm, or if it’s an in-house role? Within these two categories, as you will note from the above discussions, the range will already vary based on size of firm (to state the obvious), whether it’s local/international and so on.
|
This would be an in-house role in a Fortune 500 company. I understand that is would vary from company to company by I just wanted to get a better understanding of the range out there.
|
| Yesterday 07:54 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdaddy
Hi everyone,
I'm new to this forum and it seems like there are many seasoned professionals here. Could anyone provide insight into the typical salary range for a Privacy Counsel with 5-8 years of experience? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
|
Shouldn’t you first provide some context, are u asking range if you specialise in law firm, or if it’s an in-house role? Within these two categories, as you will note from the above discussions, the range will already vary based on size of firm (to state the obvious), whether it’s local/international and so on.
|
| Yesterday 06:51 PM |
| Unregistered |
Aaa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
To repeat, the previous comment is not referring to who you think. I am the OP and do not know this person until you mentioned it here. If you insist the post is referring to her, no point to continue engaging.
The point about not identifying people is just a general one (not specific to your comment), as I notice this thread tends to name people. It has been posted here before sometime back that if people have enough resources and take offence at the comment, one can’t discount the prospect of pre-action discovery.
In any case, the point was never about who the person is (again, no it is not the person or the firm you have in mind). The point arose from another comment about the quality of SUSS graduates and their prospects after graduation. I was merely pointing out that I have seen people who have decent prospects after graduating from SUSS, with the obvious caveat that much also depends on individual circumstances.
|
The moment you reply meaning continue to engaging. Yes, you want to clarify.
It is still continuation of the topic...
Aiyo
Noew everyone know who she is and who she dated etc.
|
| Yesterday 06:46 PM |
| Bigdaddy |
Hi everyone,
I'm new to this forum and it seems like there are many seasoned professionals here. Could anyone provide insight into the typical salary range for a Privacy Counsel with 5-8 years of experience? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
|
| 30-05-2024 04:06 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
no proper background, she can become lawyer from admin?
what she do?
|
Not sure about SUSS entry requirements as never check. For some of them, they do law diploma at poly first, after that try to enter law undergraduate course with that.
|
| 30-05-2024 04:02 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Confirm is Candice of Lee & Lee. Otherwise why so defensive?
Where is the defamation ah?
You husband ah? The inhouse fella ex Lee & Lee who dated her there.
|
To repeat, the previous comment is not referring to who you think. I am the OP and do not know this person until you mentioned it here. If you insist the post is referring to her, no point to continue engaging.
The point about not identifying people is just a general one (not specific to your comment), as I notice this thread tends to name people. It has been posted here before sometime back that if people have enough resources and take offence at the comment, one can’t discount the prospect of pre-action discovery.
In any case, the point was never about who the person is (again, no it is not the person or the firm you have in mind). The point arose from another comment about the quality of SUSS graduates and their prospects after graduation. I was merely pointing out that I have seen people who have decent prospects after graduating from SUSS, with the obvious caveat that much also depends on individual circumstances.
|
| 30-05-2024 10:02 AM |
| Unregistered |
can can
no proper background, she can become lawyer from admin?
what she do?
|
| 30-05-2024 02:59 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
No.
In any case, think we should refrain from naming or otherwise identifying specific individuals on this forum so as not to tio defamation allegations (however commonly it may be done on verbal basis in practice).
|
Confirm is Candice of Lee & Lee. Otherwise why so defensive?
Where is the defamation ah?
You husband ah? The inhouse fella ex Lee & Lee who dated her there.
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
