Today 11:01 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I have a colleague. Also GEO4. Promoted in 2021. But good performer. No KP roles yet. But 7YOE is 6.4k now. So by 10 YOE is either GEO5 or near GEO4 ceiling. So pretty good estimate by the primary teacher I will say. Even for the COVID promotees
|
Weird leh. I not good performer, average male teacher. 6.3k. Pass degree some more. What do you guys mean by good performer? Shouldn't "good performer" be like KP material and going down ST/Leadership track? These guys should have increased CEP levels, hence be promoting faster than the average joe.
|
Today 10:58 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
GEO4 here. Only hit 6k after 8YOE. Promoted during covid. Promotion and merit increments were cut during those years, and also missed out on the 10% pay raise for GEO3. Nowhere near the ceiling.
|
Don't mind me asking. Are you female?
|
Today 10:55 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustAnotherPrimaryTeacher
If you're talking about a typical BA/BSc/PGDE starter from GEO2 (salary around 3+k gross), then usually at 10 YOE, average should be drawing GEO4 salary, or near GEO4 ceiling (really depending on when you get promoted to GEO3, and to GEO4), since even with your criteria (normal form teacher), there will also be a wide spectrum.
But a good estimate will be around 6+k to 7k gross monthly, with all the bonuses, should be near 100k like what the other poster has mentioned.
Good performers should reach this 6+k in their 7th year or so. And by 10th year, depending on whether they have positions, they should at least reach GEO5 and probably even near the ceiling.
|
Not really true. I'm an average performer, pass degree, 7YOE. Spent the first 4 years of my career with Cs. Only past 3 years get more than that. Promoted to GEO4 in 2024, getting 6+k. Good performers should be getting more.
|
Today 06:49 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Thank you for the advice!
We will not know what is available until the start of the window right? Cos I have a branch in mind but I don't know if they require new blood there.
|
You could always ask somebody who is in the branch, or write in to someone in the branch to ask. If they can't tell you, they'll let you know as much, but either way you've got nothing to lose by expressing your interest in a polite and sincere manner.
If you don't ask, then yup, you'll only know when OPE opens.
|
Today 06:09 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Schools/branches are not required to wait until the end of the application window before interviewing candidates and making offers. Some popular positions get many applicants within a couple of hours of the start of OPE. The interviews may start shortly, and sometimes offers are made on the spot.
To maximise your chances, you should apply as soon as possible to the positions that you want. You can always deliberate on whether to accept the offer later on. It doesn't hurt to go for more interviews, you learn something from every one of them even if you don't get offered/don't accept their offer. Good luck!
|
Thank you for the advice!
We will not know what is available until the start of the window right? Cos I have a branch in mind but I don't know if they require new blood there.
|
Today 05:30 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Just a question about OPE, is there a number of applicants stated per post? That is, is it time sensitive or is it that you will get to register your interest as long as you apply within the window?
|
Schools/branches are not required to wait until the end of the application window before interviewing candidates and making offers. Some popular positions get many applicants within a couple of hours of the start of OPE. The interviews may start shortly, and sometimes offers are made on the spot.
To maximise your chances, you should apply as soon as possible to the positions that you want. You can always deliberate on whether to accept the offer later on. It doesn't hurt to go for more interviews, you learn something from every one of them even if you don't get offered/don't accept their offer. Good luck!
|
Today 05:10 PM |
Unregistered |
Ope
Just a question about OPE, is there a number of applicants stated per post? That is, is it time sensitive or is it that you will get to register your interest as long as you apply within the window?
|
Today 12:46 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Just went to check.. I'm GEO4 promoted 2021 also. Was drawing 5498, then salary revision in Oct 22 as a GEO4, increased to 5983. It's around 9% for me as well.
Maybe y'all should really call HR to see who gets this 9% adjustment. They must have certain considerations. Like during which period or sth. And confirm calculated on their end, to avoid backlash
|
this is really strange...promoted in 2021 will get this special adjustment, but promoted in 2020 and 2022 don't have? weird max
|
Today 12:37 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Am the poster to this previously where my batchmate called HR. Did this GEO 4 promote in 2021 period?
Because both our salary adjustments are not 5%. We had around 9% too. Maybe you ask ur GEO 4 friend to call HR? Our adjustment is definitely higher than that of GEO 3 at that time of adjustment in Oct 2022
|
Just went to check.. I'm GEO4 promoted 2021 also. Was drawing 5498, then salary revision in Oct 22 as a GEO4, increased to 5983. It's around 9% for me as well.
Maybe y'all should really call HR to see who gets this 9% adjustment. They must have certain considerations. Like during which period or sth. And confirm calculated on their end, to avoid backlash
|
Today 12:32 PM |
Unregistered |
heyy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Wa if the teacher cannot even adapt to situations and learn to pull out or modify the interactions with parents then their growth mindset is bad. You want blame SLs only, everything can also blame. But teachers communication with parents, teachers need to assume responsibility. SLs also. But u cannot just use salaries to determine SLs have a hand in everything.
Maybe the high salaries from SLs are given for their foresight to weed out negative mindsets like you, who shirks responsibility, and highly likely are resistive towards change. Just say bye to this service and move on la. Want to push everything only.
|
True. SLs governing a school is akin to a prime minister governing a nation. when the ministers (HODs), senior civil servants (SHs) and civil servants (teachers) dont perform or make mistake, why should the prime minister (principal) take the blame? the Prime Minister (SLs) is a proven competent leader that shouldnt shoulder the blame for others, since the Prime Minister (SLs) would have worked his way up to prove his worth.Yes, he’s paid the highest in the nation (school), but dont make your problem, his problem. of course, whatever contributions or positive things that the country (school) get or enjoys due to civil servants (teacher) efforts is due to the prime minister’s (SLs) guidance, so prime minister (SLs) MUST take credit.
|