Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Companies > GovTech

Companies Discuss companies and organisations.




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: GovTech Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 01:24 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I think what GovTech should focus on is to build an ecosystem that encourage reusability and fast and quality delivery. I see too many system silos and duplicated effort in solving same problems. Teams/clans/agencies build their own ecosystem and moat around it.
Is like that one lo. I build one so that everyone can use it and get recognitions

See formsg, parking sg. So popz, everyone wants to be like ogp. But reality we all work differently
Today 01:15 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Aiya why SVC and GDS fight like that. Both are funded by central/agencies and each plays different roles. GDS is on project/product delivery while SVC doing coordination, focus on Agency IT roadmap, governance etc. If both don’t collaborate and insist on own agenda, the project will fail. Quality relationships result in quality delivery. A product will sure get funding if it can flourish and bring value.
I think what GovTech should focus on is to build an ecosystem that encourage reusability and fast and quality delivery. I see too many system silos and duplicated effort in solving same problems. Teams/clans/agencies build their own ecosystem and moat around it.
Today 01:08 PM
Unregistered Aiya why SVC and GDS fight like that. Both are funded by central/agencies and each plays different roles. GDS is on project/product delivery while SVC doing coordination, focus on Agency IT roadmap, governance etc. If both don’t collaborate and insist on own agenda, the project will fail. Quality relationships result in quality delivery. A product will sure get funding if it can flourish and bring value.
Today 12:47 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
So what is the percentage of agencies managed by GT SVC, and is it increasing or decreasing over the years?
I think can count. But why does it matter
Today 12:37 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Must remain in service by 31 may, what does remain in service? If tender by mid may, does it consider still in service although serving notice?
Best is pls tender by 01 June
Today 12:18 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Stop taking in uniform group retirees. LOL
But they are true blue Sg citizens.
Today 11:17 AM
Unregistered Must remain in service by 31 may, what does remain in service? If tender by mid may, does it consider still in service although serving notice?
Today 11:16 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Maybe u want to clarify instead?

To me, GDS is bloated and rushing to cut off the fats. GDS has not deliver high impact projects recently other than AI ( that's also slowing down now)

GDS is a cost center. Basically dependent on agencies to use the app built by GDS. No one use , GDS will suffer. Cannot justify why they are there
If no one use the app, is there any chance for GDS to be “bloated”? Where is the logic..?
Today 11:05 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Agencies can write funding paper on non IT related. But agencies can only do so much

In one of the stat board here, so long theres IT component, services will take charge in writing funding paper with inputs from business. So its a joint effort.
So what is the percentage of agencies managed by GT SVC, and is it increasing or decreasing over the years?
Today 09:58 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Cybersecurity Specialist
Current employee, more than 3 years

Pros
WFH, still kinda flexi to working hour.

Cons
Org is going through re-org and everything changes quickly. Very frustrating to do work as decision from top down is not dismantle quickly causing redundant work effort. Too many long meetings and disruptive to deliverables.

Advice to Management
Stop taking in uniform group retirees

Stop taking in uniform group retirees. LOL
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2