| Today 12:47 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
So what is the percentage of agencies managed by GT SVC, and is it increasing or decreasing over the years?
|
I think can count. But why does it matter
|
| Today 12:37 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Must remain in service by 31 may, what does remain in service? If tender by mid may, does it consider still in service although serving notice?
|
Best is pls tender by 01 June
|
| Today 12:18 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Stop taking in uniform group retirees. LOL
|
But they are true blue Sg citizens.
|
| Today 11:17 AM |
| Unregistered |
Must remain in service by 31 may, what does remain in service? If tender by mid may, does it consider still in service although serving notice?
|
| Today 11:16 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Maybe u want to clarify instead?
To me, GDS is bloated and rushing to cut off the fats. GDS has not deliver high impact projects recently other than AI ( that's also slowing down now)
GDS is a cost center. Basically dependent on agencies to use the app built by GDS. No one use , GDS will suffer. Cannot justify why they are there
|
If no one use the app, is there any chance for GDS to be “bloated”? Where is the logic..?
|
| Today 11:05 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Agencies can write funding paper on non IT related. But agencies can only do so much
In one of the stat board here, so long theres IT component, services will take charge in writing funding paper with inputs from business. So its a joint effort.
|
So what is the percentage of agencies managed by GT SVC, and is it increasing or decreasing over the years?
|
| Today 09:58 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Cybersecurity Specialist
Current employee, more than 3 years
Pros
WFH, still kinda flexi to working hour.
Cons
Org is going through re-org and everything changes quickly. Very frustrating to do work as decision from top down is not dismantle quickly causing redundant work effort. Too many long meetings and disruptive to deliverables.
Advice to Management
Stop taking in uniform group retirees
|
Stop taking in uniform group retirees. LOL
|
| Today 09:12 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Cybersecurity Specialist
Current employee, more than 3 years
Pros
WFH, still kinda flexi to working hour.
Cons
Org is going through re-org and everything changes quickly. Very frustrating to do work as decision from top down is not dismantle quickly causing redundant work effort. Too many long meetings and disruptive to deliverables.
Advice to Management
Stop taking in uniform group retirees
|
CSG going through a reorg. Really wonder what's CSG direction now. We need CSG to do some security related work in projects, now they get pulled out, what they will focus on ,I wonder
|
| Today 09:10 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
What makes you think agencies can't write the funding papers themselves? They simply punt it to you to do it because you exist. You think they don't have to do any writing themselves to request for a system to be built?
I am simply saying you SVC folks need to be honest and recognize your own mediocrity.
|
Agencies can write funding paper on non IT related. But agencies can only do so much
In one of the stat board here, so long theres IT component, services will take charge in writing funding paper with inputs from business. So its a joint effort.
|
| Today 09:08 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Haha, my apologies, you are not from GDS hence you do not know why GDS is having a mass exodus.
|
Maybe u want to clarify instead?
To me, GDS is bloated and rushing to cut off the fats. GDS has not deliver high impact projects recently other than AI ( that's also slowing down now)
GDS is a cost center. Basically dependent on agencies to use the app built by GDS. No one use , GDS will suffer. Cannot justify why they are there
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
