| Today 10:14 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
To add on, don be narrow minded. You may think we SVC are really bad and you had seen enough, but there are almost 2k SVC officers, you seen that many?
Also as an AR, if you have access to oneSpace, please take a look how many folks from GDS been coming over to SVC (Safe Haven) from all the “re-org”  |
Yes, there's 2k SVC officers and I haven't seen them all. But I have been in the local tech scene for a long time, long enough to be convinced that service group is a horrible place.
GDS folks going to SVC for safe haven? Maybe because your turnover is so high, you have a lot of spare headcount.
If you don't recognize the mediocrity that is service group, then you must still be new, naive or delusional.
|
| Today 10:08 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Let’s not name and finger point… a Chinese saying is think about where the water comes from when drinking water.
AR need both GDS/SVC and GDS need SVC as agencies give Headcount.
While CE mentioned some stability but that didn’t run away of HC transfer de la.
Without SVC which is 50% of GVT, I think can forget about AR or GDS because we are the single biggest customers served by GDS or those SI.
Is ok to be trash in your eyes cos we cannot control how one thinks, but we are those trash that give you a job |
You think too highly of service group. I have a job because agencies are requesting for systems to be built or maintained. Similarly, you are dependent on agencies too.
|
| Today 10:08 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
SVC also asked to leave, are you sure it is still safe haven?
|
I also from SVC, I must say, some SVC folks is really cannot make it too hence managed out… then again is very extreme cases.
SVC PM/DBA/CIE all kio sai… like audits and even is GDS fault also become SVC fault….and don do those very rosy job like our GDS colleagues. This is why SVC requires certain experience to manage users and GDS can just heck care
|
| Today 10:04 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
which service group may I ask? can give an example how trash?
|
I can name an example or two, but not revealing their exact names.
One of the earlier projects I was involved in. Service group PM was in the initial stages and part of the BPR. Kept rejecting the requests of the users, told them "simple simple description can already". Management consulting company produced the final document, but we could barely use it. Ended up had to do some BPR ourselves before we could get a flow that meets their needs and policies. TLDR; PM mismanaged requirements gathering and ended up with a BPR that was a poor fit.
Another project. PM was nothing more than a message router. Constantly forwarding checklists to us without vetting the contents. More than half could have been filled it by them. TLDR; PM was only concerned with ticking items off checklists.
Oh, I did work with a wonderful BA from service group before though. No nonsense, worked very well with the PO and the engineers and prioritized the needs of the agency. Helped to get user buy-in and the outgoing vendor to cooperate, data migration went smoothly. Her colleagues didn't like her though so she transferred out soon after. Truly a breeding ground for mediocrity.
|
| Today 10:03 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Let’s not name and finger point… a Chinese saying is think about where the water comes from when drinking water.
AR need both GDS/SVC and GDS need SVC as agencies give Headcount.
While CE mentioned some stability but that didn’t run away of HC transfer de la.
Without SVC which is 50% of GVT, I think can forget about AR or GDS because we are the single biggest customers served by GDS or those SI.
Is ok to be trash in your eyes cos we cannot control how one thinks, but we are those trash that give you a job |
Ya loh, we SVC write papers to get project funding and headcount to hire them. When the engineers screw up, we still need to seek to explain to bosses and seek risk acceptance.
|
| Today 10:01 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
SVC also asked to leave, are you sure it is still safe haven?
|
I am from one of the largest ministries, and I can tell you nobody is being asked to leave. In fact, we are getting more PCs. The GDS folks who are working on our ministry's projects are the ones asked to leave.
|
| Today 09:51 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
AR nia la. why did SVC headcount explode so fast? Because central throw mandates, Becausw GDS throw ****, OGP dump trash all to who? To the agencies.
SVC need to people to kio sai and pacify users
|
not AR, govtechie
|
| Today 09:45 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
SVC also asked to leave, are you sure it is still safe haven?
|
AR nia la. why did SVC headcount explode so fast? Because central throw mandates, Becausw GDS throw ****, OGP dump trash all to who? To the agencies.
SVC need to people to kio sai and pacify users
|
| Today 09:42 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
To add on, don be narrow minded. You may think we SVC are really bad and you had seen enough, but there are almost 2k SVC officers, you seen that many?
Also as an AR, if you have access to oneSpace, please take a look how many folks from GDS been coming over to SVC (Safe Haven) from all the “re-org” |
SVC also asked to leave, are you sure it is still safe haven?
|
| Today 09:40 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Yup, will share more end of the month.
Now still early. Hold on
|
about re-org?
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
