| Today 02:21 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Key is depends on who you need to work with, and whether other comments on other agencies are even more pointed, that's a personal judgement  . One can recall the mass exodus not too long ago from TG (esp the div heads), which i am sure alot can attest as to why people leave (although there is also replacement). |
Really? Thought most people would hesitate to burn bridges, except in cases where they feel they were really wronged. If that’s the case, wouldn’t most people give the usual reasons for leaving like wanna do something else, higher pay and whatnot?
Anyway, unless someone has really done you wrong, naming and shaming doesn’t really benefit anyone. From other perspective, they may also take the view any managed reshuffle was for the greater good, more efficient, better performers to replace and so on. And how would you show otherwise, without all sides wasting a lot of time to try and prove their point? If people don’t wanna listen they don’t wanna listen
|
| Today 12:45 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Actually for those who don’t have personal involvement or tiagong about certain incidents or issues or depts, it won’t be so easy to infer.
Nothing is all bad or all good, a lot depends on who you need to work with. If you have a look at the comments on other agencies, they are even more pointed, here considered quite good already!
|
Key is depends on who you need to work with, and whether other comments on other agencies are even more pointed, that's a personal judgement . One can recall the mass exodus not too long ago from TG (esp the div heads), which i am sure alot can attest as to why people leave (although there is also replacement).
|
| Today 11:15 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Bad people don't get identified ..so easily (if you try hard to infer you may know who) because of course the risks of getting the poster identified may be high.
But I think the main purpose of identifying certain kinds of behaviour here and what not, is to give people a "true" picture of this organization. It's not a bed of roses like what is portrayed out there, people should not only know the good, but have just as much view of the horrific before they join...
|
Actually for those who don’t have personal involvement or tiagong about certain incidents or issues or depts, it won’t be so easy to infer.
Nothing is all bad or all good, a lot depends on who you need to work with. If you have a look at the comments on other agencies, they are even more pointed, here considered quite good already!
|
| Today 09:56 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Hear, hear! Give you virtual bonus for good sense!
So far don’t think anyone has been identified, the only identifiable person had good things said about them. Hahaha. Shows that if people are blameless, no need to fear forum opinions?
|
Bad people don't get identified ..so easily (if you try hard to infer you may know who) because of course the risks of getting the poster identified may be high.
But I think the main purpose of identifying certain kinds of behaviour here and what not, is to give people a "true" picture of this organization. It's not a bed of roses like what is portrayed out there, people should not only know the good, but have just as much view of the horrific before they join...
|
| Today 09:36 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Chill people.. Honest opinions or not, it is just represent the opinion of a person. no right or wrong and like it or not, everyone is entitled to their own opinions.
Someone may think highly of a certain dep, others may not. it could be many factors like unpleasant working rs with certain people in the dep.
As long as you dont go posting things that could identify a person causing reputation damages and having no supporting evidence on what you post, i dont think people are so free to hunt you down.
|
Hear, hear! Give you virtual bonus for good sense!
So far don’t think anyone has been identified, the only identifiable person had good things said about them. Hahaha. Shows that if people are blameless, no need to fear forum opinions?
|
| Today 07:05 AM |
| Unregistered |
Chill people.. Honest opinions or not, it is just represent the opinion of a person. no right or wrong and like it or not, everyone is entitled to their own opinions.
Someone may think highly of a certain dep, others may not. it could be many factors like unpleasant working rs with certain people in the dep.
As long as you dont go posting things that could identify a person causing reputation damages and having no supporting evidence on what you post, i dont think people are so free to hunt you down.
|
| Today 02:52 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Are you suggesting that people do engage criminal activity by getting outside help to help trace people illegally? Or are you suggesting that police and SingTel or whatever illegally give up user details without a court order? Or are you suggesting a court order can be obtained just because someone rant online about his company?
Maybe should trace you first for your insinuation
|
You are very imaginative. No point explaining if you don’t already know.
Limpeh only tell true stories. Limpeh sit by my farm having a smoke while waiting for you to ownself find out answers to own questions above.
|
| Today 02:01 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
LMPO
As for your comment, obviously you don’t know enough to know that if people really want to trace who you are, they don’t need to do it themselves. The only question then is what is the cost of taking up this exercise. IYKYK!
|
Are you suggesting that people do engage criminal activity by getting outside help to help trace people illegally? Or are you suggesting that police and SingTel or whatever illegally give up user details without a court order? Or are you suggesting a court order can be obtained just because someone rant online about his company?
Maybe should trace you first for your insinuation
|
| Yesterday 11:48 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
you talk like MAS got extraordinary hacking skills to track down people who post here. Do you think TG really got IT special forces? My toes are laughing
Notwithstanding that hacking/pulling strings to identify people who make benign comments online just to target them is a crime itself
|
LMPO
Are you one of those who got grudge against TG? I certainly don’t. MAS is far from the most digitalised workplace around, but I don’t think it’s solely a TG problem. For me, basic facilities like IT clinic work, the people there are friendly and helpful.
You also on wrong track. People talking about calling out IRL. As for your comment, obviously you don’t know enough to know that if people really want to trace who you are, they don’t need to do it themselves. The only question then is what is the cost of taking up this exercise. IYKYK!
|
| Yesterday 11:30 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
you talk like MAS got extraordinary hacking skills to track down people who post here. Do you think TG really got IT special forces? My toes are laughing
Notwithstanding that hacking/pulling strings to identify people who make benign comments online just to target them is a crime itself
|
Yeap spot on on that. A lot idiots here just trying to smoke and play the bluff game to deter people from posting honest views. Call it and post it! 
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
