Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Lawyer Salary

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

 Citibank Cash Back Card - up to $350 cash back* - Click to Apply Now 
Thread: Lawyer Salary Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 09:26 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
is doing construction law good?
It's a big area. A lot of work to go around. A lot of money in the right teams.

Long hours, shitty bosses and difficult to get promotions in the prominent firms. The few known people are all still quite young and aren't leaving anything soon. The mid-small size firms require sai kang warriors who can take a lot of ****.

It's easier to make partner if you specialize in a different area of law... but i've always found the people to be interesting and the work rewarding. I enjoy it even though I've been doing this for about 6 years and haven't made partner yet.

To each his own.
Today 07:24 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
What about litigation in a specific area (ie constructions or restructuring) in an international firm (ie baker, Clyde)? What are the exit options and if one goes into this route are they stuck in the same position as those in general liti?

Appreciate some valuable insights regarding this. Many thanks.
is doing construction law good?
Yesterday 11:23 PM
Unregistered
Tito Issac

How is it like working at Tito Issac? Working hours? Is the pay good for NQ?
Yesterday 11:20 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
People don't want to do fam/crim for a reason - which is that it's hard to jump and generally pays less. High net worth divorces won't come to you - and the type of criminals you typically defend generally aren't rich.

Depending on your grades and work experience (at least 2.1), you can try to lateral into AGC crim department, or Minlaw (family) type roles.

Otherwise, you will end up stuck in gen lit. It's not going to be so easy to move around as a gen lit (from what I assume is a small fam law firm). If you're serious, just reach out to any fam law practitioners, I find they are typically nice enough to respond.
Thanks so much for the advise.
Yesterday 11:06 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
fk litigation. source: liti lolyer. thank you that is all.
What about litigation in a specific area (ie constructions or restructuring) in an international firm (ie baker, Clyde)? What are the exit options and if one goes into this route are they stuck in the same position as those in general liti?

Appreciate some valuable insights regarding this. Many thanks.
Yesterday 10:40 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
NQ corp trainee who didnt get retained. Managed to secure an in house role but am wondering if that's a career suicide? am keen to move back into practice but having a hard time looking for corp NQ openings now and am afraid gen liti roles isnt that transferrable to corp either.
fk litigation. source: liti lolyer. thank you that is all.
Yesterday 09:52 PM
Unregistered NQ corp trainee who didnt get retained. Managed to secure an in house role but am wondering if that's a career suicide? am keen to move back into practice but having a hard time looking for corp NQ openings now and am afraid gen liti roles isnt that transferrable to corp either.
Yesterday 08:37 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Prospective trainee here. If I choose to train in family law (due to passion, interest etc) and realise that itís not my cup of tea, what are the exit options? Assuming that Iíll be exposed to contested divorce cases.
People don't want to do fam/crim for a reason - which is that it's hard to jump and generally pays less. High net worth divorces won't come to you - and the type of criminals you typically defend generally aren't rich.

Depending on your grades and work experience (at least 2.1), you can try to lateral into AGC crim department, or Minlaw (family) type roles.

Otherwise, you will end up stuck in gen lit. It's not going to be so easy to move around as a gen lit (from what I assume is a small fam law firm). If you're serious, just reach out to any fam law practitioners, I find they are typically nice enough to respond.
Yesterday 11:55 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Anyone successfully landed an in-house role without the requisite experience in the specific areas listed on the job ad? E.g. trademarks, corporate secretarial, or building and construction laws...etc.

If so, how did you survive the selection process? Crash course before the interview? Convince the interviewer of your abilities to pick up fast?
I was in-house for a few years while completing my masters. Here's my two cents.

Most companies advertising for junior positions don't expect miracles. So long as you meet about 50-70% of the job description, you'll probably get at least a call back. When i first went in-house I had 0 corp/comm experience, but majority of my disputes experience was in the energy/engineering/construction sector. My boss felt that my knowledge of the industry outweighed the fact that I had no corp/comm experience and everything else could be learned on the job. I stayed there for almost 2 years and while the learning curve was steep, it was a rewarding experience.

The problem is when companies are hiring for sole legal counsels or are looking to set up local offices or are looking for someone to head a team. These positions will not generally hire peeps without the experience mentioned in the job description.
Yesterday 10:32 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Probably all
It depends on the quality of the 20% gen lit work you end up doing. If that 20% includes civ trial at the HC Level or a CA hearing, you could easily nego for a lesser PQE cut.

A lot depends on what kind of cases you pick up.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2