Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Lawyer Salary

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: Lawyer Salary Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 02:28 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Don't be too harsh on him. Law sch doesn't adequately teach people how to draw inferences from datasets.
Hi. 9 PQE here. Just wanted to say that the data presented by said study is not entirely accurate. The amount the firm pays our NQs are not codified or follow a fixed set of rules. At least that’s what I know from my discussions with HR.

When I see a freshly called lawyer, especially if it’s an interview for a job setting, I usually look at how his body language first. After that I ask questions and based on the replies I get, determine whether he or she will be a good fit in the team.

The salary I would say also differs from person to person. Don’t believe there is any benchmark or ceiling. At least not from the ones I recommend to HR.

If the person comes out to me as knowledgeable, respectful and willing to learn, I would have a good impression compared to a NQ that says rubbish and acts arrogant.

For example, if an NQ says something like “logic would dictate that…” I would not have a very good impression of him/her because to me it sounds like he thinks he is better than everyone. This kind of character would not do well in a law firm so chances are, I would not want him in my team.

But if the person talks like this:
“I am a blank sheet of paper, a freshly called graduate but I am willing to learn.” Then it’s a whole different story.
Today 02:20 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Median means the figure cited is probably equal or lower than Big4, if you have even an inkling of understanding about lawyers' salary market in Singapore.
You’re a troll if you think GES means ****. My junior got offered 6.8k at big4. Depends on experience, resume, how much they like you etc.

Only a fool would say there is a benchmark for salary for all NQs. Room temperature IQ also will know. Sadly common sense isn’t so common anymore.
Today 01:18 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Median means the figure cited is probably equal or lower than Big4, if you have even an inkling of understanding about lawyers' salary market in Singapore.
Don't be too harsh on him. Law sch doesn't adequately teach people how to draw inferences from datasets.
Today 12:24 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Do you understand what median means?
Median means the figure cited is probably equal or lower than Big4, if you have even an inkling of understanding about lawyers' salary market in Singapore.
Today 09:13 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Upon mass call in Aug, NQ is ~7k for Big4.

Logic would dictate that it cannot be ~ 6.7k, since GES 2023 results already puts the median starting at 7k, and GES survey is normally done during Nov to Dec every year.

7.8k is probably referring to 1PQE, which newly called junior associates will be regarded as, upon Jan of the immediate next calendar year.

Do you understand what median means?
Today 09:12 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Lmao I’m surprised you could type this drivel out since you apparently have your hands full giving Ethan a shitty handjob.
Why is what he said considered nonsense though? I feel the same to be honest. Ethan’s legal actions are justified. It’s about time SJW like Nadine learnt the harsh truth of reality, that you cannot get away with anything just because you cry financial difficulties or feign mental health problems. Don’t start problems you cannot solve.

One could also argue that you’re a simp for defending Nadine’s actions.

In any event, you can say all you want but Nadine has to apologise on social media and still has to bear the brunt of her actions. I think this is the justice we need. Imagine being a law student and getting fked over by what you’re learning. The irony is real.
Today 09:02 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Thanks very much for the info, appreciate it. Just a side note, this is knowledge and research and not quite about what logic “dictates”.
Appreciate the unnecessary comment about a trivial turn of phrase. Charming
Today 01:20 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Can ask - when NQs to be get called in August, whats the big 4 salary range for NQs?

Some say 6.7K, some say 7.2K and yet some say 7.8K??
A&G market leader and best firm in SG 7k 10 char
Yesterday 09:09 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Upon mass call in Aug, NQ is ~7k for Big4.

Logic would dictate that it cannot be ~ 6.7k, since GES 2023 results already puts the median starting at 7k, and GES survey is normally done during Nov to Dec every year.

7.8k is probably referring to 1PQE, which newly called junior associates will be regarded as, upon Jan of the immediate next calendar year.
Thanks very much for the info, appreciate it. Just a side note, this is knowledge and research and not quite about what logic “dictates”.
Yesterday 06:55 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Regarding the Nadine v Ethan Ong saga, I personally feel like Nadine was out of line. She has no interest in the matter, tried to be a SJW and land a punch in order to seek some online fame/attention.

In the end, she got punched back and is constantly putting up social media posts for attention despite saying she is not looking for attention/pity/gofundme.

If you are reading this Nadine, I hope this is a wake up call for you that the real world is merciless. As you are a year 2 Law Student in one of the most prestigious law schools in the world, I find it absolutely unacceptable that you did not even consider the consequences of your actions. I hope that game you are playing, "genshin shitpack" or whatever it is called keeps your mental health in check, because when you tried to post such remarks online about someone else, they had to keep their mental health in check too.

I don't feel sorry for you in the least bit. In fact I hope your parents pay the full price of it i.e. the law suit etc. It is partially their fault for not grooming your EQ. Hope this is a valuable lesson you will take to the grave. No one is buying your "financial difficulties" issue either. You started this, you should see it through. Maybe you can earn back some decency/dignity or people's respect once you paid your dues.

If Ethan is reading this, just note that my opinion above is solely on your choice to take legal action, and has nothing to do with the events beforehand i.e. the alcohol incident. That is a different matter, not saying I agree or disagree regardless.
Lmao I’m surprised you could type this drivel out since you apparently have your hands full giving Ethan a shitty handjob.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2