![]() |
Today 12:32 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
this reminds me of how meaningless the NUS v KCL debate here is. |
|
Today 12:13 AM | ||
Unregistered | So Kings (50% FCH) is better than Melbourne (10% FCH). Got it. | |
Yesterday 11:59 PM | ||
Unregistered | Yup and in the grand scheme working in Aus doesn’t provide you as much portability thereafter compared to London | |
Yesterday 11:17 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Yesterday 10:26 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Never mind the trolls. Just last page people were talking about Saqib Alam (King’s alumni) being elected partner at MoFo in London. I would recommend you pick between UK and Aus depending on whether you might prefer to work in the UK or Aus in addition to Singapore (although not impossible for Aus graduates to get UK training contracts). Why so sure you have to start training in Singapore? |
|
Yesterday 09:14 PM | ||
Unregistered | melbourne is for sure better than Kings lol | |
Yesterday 04:31 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
Sydney law also 3.2 poly GPA. Singapore poly failure can go in. Lol. |
|
Yesterday 04:26 PM | ||
Unregistered | Is it? Must call police. | |
Yesterday 04:24 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
|
|
Yesterday 03:20 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
Those who can make it into NUS/SMU can definitely get into UCL. Typically, employers do not differentiate between NUS/SMU. Both are seen as equal. Melbourne's curriculum is more rigorous than Kings, just compare the number of FCH. I would put Sydney over Kings too tbh. |
|
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |