Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options Automatically parse links in text Automatically retrieve titles from external links

Today 02:49 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Well they been doing big successful real world implementation by themselves... Top of the cream so I guess it make sense why...

which is? AI that could rival chatGPT and gemini? hahahah

Today 02:06 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

can HR/DCE explain why double standard for PIC team?

Well they been doing big successful real world implementation by themselves... Top of the cream so I guess it make sense why...

Today 01:59 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Probably getting too expensive. Org cant have majority seniors and above right?

Quote:

1 Senior Director
2 Director
13 Principal engineers/UX (grade k)
12 Lead engineers/UX (grade j)
11 Senior engineers/UX (grade i)
22 engineers/UX (grade g/h)
0 associate engineers/UX

this is crazy, 27 out of 61 in 1 team are Lead and above level, what kind of team structure here

Quote:

here are the salaries offered per month to indeed people:
Grade E - 7,000 - 1 year
Grade F - 8250 - 2 year
Grade G - 9500 - 3 years
Grade H - 10750 - 4 years
Grade I - 12,000 - 5 years
also, YOEs are inflated: indeed SWE who worked for 9 months considered as 1 year.
i got friends in govtech - so i know the system. normal SWE takes around 4 years to reach G, and is only around 8500 monthly.

can HR/DCE explain why double standard for PIC team?

Today 01:25 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

How are the ex Indeeders integrating into GT? Just doing a routine check. Have they been making big waves with their superior calibre and intellect?

Why so salty? Mind your own business.

Today 01:22 PM

Unregistered

How are the ex Indeeders integrating into GT? Just doing a routine check. Have they been making big waves with their superior calibre and intellect?

Today 01:21 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

meaning? Cyber paid more than Apps in same grade? then the new changes will address some of the inequality right? since the only differential in future will be MDR?

Who said this tho? Got confirmation alr?

Today 01:20 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

the agency cyber headcount cost more than an equivalent apps person in same grade

They might have special skills la. Just like SA. SA are probably paid more than regular BA / PM or even DSM

Today 01:19 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

for most agencies, there is no need snr TS or BA or PM. there are the DSMs, and TSMs to cover that already.

Meaning to say DSM should be doing the ground work?

Or we should still have pm, ba, ts but we don't need senior level aka grade I

Today 01:05 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

the agency cyber headcount cost more than an equivalent apps person in same grade

meaning? Cyber paid more than Apps in same grade? then the new changes will address some of the inequality right? since the only differential in future will be MDR?

Today 01:00 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Probably getting too expensive. Org cant have majority seniors and above right?

the agency cyber headcount cost more than an equivalent apps person in same grade

This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules