Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Stat board tiers

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Citibank Lazada Credit Card, Free $150 Lazada Vouchers* - Click to Apply Now
Thread: Stat board tiers Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
23-05-2020 05:38 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
This is the stupidest thread on a forum that is full of them holy crap

Just a bunch of people from insignificant roles and places within the large bureaucratic CS trying to put down other people in the same system

Hello you're all cogs in the same big machine. Cog in URA or cog in EDB, got difference meh? Same government. Same pay bands. Same system. Go home to the same hdb flat.

What a shitshow that anyone in the private sector is laughing at
Lol, yet the whole of CS is probably earning more than 70% of their peers in the private sector. Lots of people settle for private because they were not smart enough to get into CS.
23-05-2020 01:01 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Haha this made my day! Lol! with eye-rolls from CS folks here!

Same same for private sector bunch of underlings.. who are equally mire in big organisations.. and hence the need to rant to feel godlike.. hdb flat is good!
i agree! as if an employee in private company got that much more autonomy.

who else agree? kee chiu!
22-05-2020 08:16 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
This is the stupidest thread on a forum that is full of them holy crap

Just a bunch of people from insignificant roles and places within the large bureaucratic CS trying to put down other people in the same system

Hello you're all cogs in the same big machine. Cog in URA or cog in EDB, got difference meh? Same government. Same pay bands. Same system. Go home to the same hdb flat.

What a shitshow that anyone in the private sector is laughing at
Haha this made my day! Lol! with eye-rolls from CS folks here!

Same same for private sector bunch of underlings.. who are equally mire in big organisations.. and hence the need to rant to feel godlike.. hdb flat is good!
18-05-2020 08:28 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
This is the stupidest thread on a forum that is full of them holy crap

Just a bunch of people from insignificant roles and places within the large bureaucratic CS trying to put down other people in the same system

Hello you're all cogs in the same big machine. Cog in URA or cog in EDB, got difference meh? Same government. Same pay bands. Same system. Go home to the same hdb flat.

What a shitshow that anyone in the private sector is laughing at
private sector getting retrenched everywhere, who's laughing now?
17-05-2020 07:31 PM
Unregistered This is the stupidest thread on a forum that is full of them holy crap

Just a bunch of people from insignificant roles and places within the large bureaucratic CS trying to put down other people in the same system

Hello you're all cogs in the same big machine. Cog in URA or cog in EDB, got difference meh? Same government. Same pay bands. Same system. Go home to the same hdb flat.

What a shitshow that anyone in the private sector is laughing at
17-05-2020 06:49 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
It was a joke...

Like you lmao
Roflol!! * i clap for my ditzy self *
17-05-2020 06:25 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
wonders why MINDEF at T4 and SAF at T5 ROFLOL!!!???

in terms of $$$ for equivalent grades, MINDEF DXO > CS MXO.. SAF uniform folks also > MHA folks and MXOs lol!!!

this tier is from poster's "perceived prestige" perspective? btw I am not from MINDEF/SAF

also nothing against MEWR and MCCY - but on same tier as Minlaw?? (ok this is my own view that they are not on par)
It was a joke...

Like you lmao
17-05-2020 06:07 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Tier 1: MAS, EDB, PMO, MTI, MOF, MFA, GovTech
Tier 2:
Tier 3: MHA, MND, MCCY, MEWR, MOE, MINLAW
Tier 4: MINDEF
Tier 5: SAF
Tier 6: Republic Poly, Nanyang Poly, Temasek Poly, Singapore Poly, Ngee Ann Poly, URA, IMDA, HDB, LTA, AGD
wonders why MINDEF at T4 and SAF at T5 ROFLOL!!!???

in terms of $$$ for equivalent grades, MINDEF DXO > CS MXO.. SAF uniform folks also > MHA folks and MXOs lol!!!

this tier is from poster's "perceived prestige" perspective? btw I am not from MINDEF/SAF

also nothing against MEWR and MCCY - but on same tier as Minlaw?? (ok this is my own view that they are not on par)
17-05-2020 04:36 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
this tiering is quite hilarious.. thanks for brightening up a dreary CB-induced weekend
Most hilarious post ever... prob true for MAS, EDB, MTI & MOF tho for tier 1 but cant say the same for the rest LOL
17-05-2020 03:50 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Tier 1: MAS, EDB, PMO, MTI, MOF, MFA, GovTech
Tier 2:
Tier 3: MHA, MND, MCCY, MEWR, MOE, MINLAW
Tier 4: MINDEF
Tier 5: SAF
Tier 6: Republic Poly, Nanyang Poly, Temasek Poly, Singapore Poly, Ngee Ann Poly, URA, IMDA, HDB, LTA, AGD
this tiering is quite hilarious.. thanks for brightening up a dreary CB-induced weekend
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2