28-08-2017 08:11 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
Person B will do well as a specialist, up to a certain point. As a specialist, your career goals will be more regional or global head of that specific area. Most international banks will have such roles, given their regional and international presence. Nonetheless, if you are good at what you are doing, and can comprehend and articulate the compliance risk well, there is no stopping for someone to move from a generalist to a specialist role, vice versa. Compliance standards are always changing, and the environment is always evolving. |
|
27-08-2017 01:25 AM | ||
i_stinks |
Company overstaffed: prefer specialist Company understaffed: prefer generalist |
|
26-08-2017 09:42 PM | ||
dreamzknight |
which of the following 2 persons has better credentials and stand out? For someone working in Compliance now, which of the following 2 has better credentials ? Is having a diverse experience in working different areas of banking better or just having only Compliance experience? Person A: Having a diverse working experience in banking in Compliance, Financial Markets and Consumer banking Person B: Have been working in Compliance only since graduation. |