Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options Automatically parse links in text Automatically retrieve titles from external links

Today 07:36 AM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustAnotherPrimaryTeacher

From the EO JH, it will be rolled out in 2026. But schools will gradually have some engagement sessions to introduce more about the Teacher Growth Model, like what some others have shared.

Currently only the ROs need to adopt this new format into the rankings. Not much info has been given yet as well. So all just waiting and see. But stick to the basics. Classroom Mgt, proper T&L, contribute in roles you are given. You should be fine.

Doubt that there will be any real changes to appraisal, so long as they keep the bell curve system.

At most it changes the way we write our work review forms

On the ground, during ranking, it is still based on horsetrading among the ranking panels, based on the loudest voice and highest visibility.

Same old stuff in new packaging

Yesterday 08:59 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

interesting...based on past posts it seems like those promoted in 2022 were most disadvantaged...yet those promoted in 2021 got 9% adjustment

anyone tried clarifying with HR before?

My best guess is that the batch promoting from GEO3 to 4 was smallest in 2022, so there will be minimum backlash for only 5% adjustment.

Calling HR probably will not change anything. Maybe just receive template mysterious answers.

Yesterday 05:59 PM

JustAnotherPrimaryTeacher

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

any advice on the new epms? like how is it different?

Yesterday 03:40 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

It is a very interesting experience for the students to come here and see such remarks made by teachers and adults. So, that's how the elders behave. Truly slothful

actually I think those making remarks are all not elders. most should be recent grads. meaning they were recent students too. You yourself are also probably recent grad or non-veteran. Veterans that I know don't visit such sites. So don't think the 'elders' are relevant here.

It's more of our gen (199x to early 2000s) that are visiting this forum. So there you have it. I can admit our generation is like that. Lambasting each other. Step on people.

Sadly it seems like most of us are like that. Like you, adding that slothful, just for the sake of injecting more negativity. Like.. Ok lor..

Yesterday 12:22 PM

Unregistered

I don't see a lot of constructive, productive, non-biased discussion for the past many pages.

Some people are asking questions without doing any initiative and end up being called for asking for spoonfeeding in which I do agree.

Instead of a scenario based or specific criteria to the question itself, I failed to see the productiveness in the discussion.

Talking about salary increment range and end up comparing to the peers?

The SL and HODs are being appointed by respectable higherups and they deserve the position. Other may dislike their choices or trains of thoughts but do you ever think from their perspective on why they insist on taking such action?

There is a possibility of SL / HOD lost the passion / pride towards work. Then, raise it up to address the concern, (put more effort or get a replacement if are deemed unsuited for the role). Of course, provided that the staffs have the guts to raise the concern.

If are not happy, then change school or quit the industry and join somewhere else. Civil servants are very rare to get retrenchment. So, the rice bowl is stable amidst the workload and work environment.

People has expectations towards civil servants. There was a post someone mentioning that it is a Singapore culture to pawn each other but that is irrelevant. You are getting into civil servant job and intend to bring this culture as well?

Feel free to ignore this post if you think it is biased.

Yesterday 08:16 AM

Unregistered

Funny

It is a very interesting experience for the students to come here and see such remarks made by teachers and adults. So, that's how the elders behave. Truly slothful

Yesterday 07:54 AM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

i think this got lost in the mix. let me help to bump it up. But I'm not a teacher so if any teachers with constructive info pls ans this.

It is meant to better assess teacher performance and guide their improvement.

It is always important to project a positive and constructive attitude.

There should also be a strong drive to learn.

The learning should not be confined to pedagogies but
extend to technology and psychology.

15-05-2024 11:59 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

any advice on the new epms? like how is it different?

I think just read up more about TGM. It's basically tying in with those STP stuff that you have learnt in NIE or in service. Also got more avenues to note down your contributions rather than just T&L and projects.

15-05-2024 11:44 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

i think this got lost in the mix. let me help to bump it up. But I'm not a teacher so if any teachers with constructive info pls ans this.

Don’t worry about it. Heard it’ll only come into effect from 2026. Basically we need to be more explicit in marketing ourselves and aspirations more.

15-05-2024 10:58 PM

Unregistered

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered

any advice on the new epms? like how is it different?

i think this got lost in the mix. let me help to bump it up. But I'm not a teacher so if any teachers with constructive info pls ans this.

This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules