| Yesterday 11:59 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
any advice on the new epms? like how is it different?
|
I think just read up more about TGM. It's basically tying in with those STP stuff that you have learnt in NIE or in service. Also got more avenues to note down your contributions rather than just T&L and projects.
|
| Yesterday 11:44 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
i think this got lost in the mix. let me help to bump it up. But I'm not a teacher so if any teachers with constructive info pls ans this.
|
Don’t worry about it. Heard it’ll only come into effect from 2026. Basically we need to be more explicit in marketing ourselves and aspirations more.
|
| Yesterday 10:58 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
any advice on the new epms? like how is it different?
|
i think this got lost in the mix. let me help to bump it up. But I'm not a teacher so if any teachers with constructive info pls ans this.
|
| Yesterday 10:55 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustAnotherPrimaryTeacher
I am a teacher, I won't hide behind anonymity.
But bearing in mind that not all posts here are made by teachers, and not all teachers will post here either. These comments do not represent the sentiments of the entire fraternity. I would like to urge for the discussion to get back on a more civil track. We can have disagreements and proceed with discourse, but I'm sure we can do it better.
Stereotyping of any jobs, including Teachers/KPs/SLs will definitely attract a lot of discussion. It is not a good way to proceed with discourse though.
Similarly, negative words like 'rubbish' or words intending to put people down, are also not useful.
Scrolling through the past few pages or so, there's nothing concrete discussed. Just people trying to rile each other.
So let's move on and talk about things that matter. And ignore any put-down posts that are biased and unproductive.
|
couldn't agree more. let's start ignoring those posts.
|
| Yesterday 08:58 PM |
| Unregistered |
Excuse me u think u teaching pri sch kids ah lollllll
Teaching is a lousy job that attracts below avg ppl who were once CMI students haha
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustAnotherPrimaryTeacher
I am a teacher, I won't hide behind anonymity.
But bearing in mind that not all posts here are made by teachers, and not all teachers will post here either. These comments do not represent the sentiments of the entire fraternity. I would like to urge for the discussion to get back on a more civil track. We can have disagreements and proceed with discourse, but I'm sure we can do it better.
Stereotyping of any jobs, including Teachers/KPs/SLs will definitely attract a lot of discussion. It is not a good way to proceed with discourse though.
Similarly, negative words like 'rubbish' or words intending to put people down, are also not useful.
Scrolling through the past few pages or so, there's nothing concrete discussed. Just people trying to rile each other.
So let's move on and talk about things that matter. And ignore any put-down posts that are biased and unproductive.
|
|
| Yesterday 04:55 PM |
| JustAnotherPrimaryTeacher |
I am a teacher, I won't hide behind anonymity.
But bearing in mind that not all posts here are made by teachers, and not all teachers will post here either. These comments do not represent the sentiments of the entire fraternity. I would like to urge for the discussion to get back on a more civil track. We can have disagreements and proceed with discourse, but I'm sure we can do it better.
Stereotyping of any jobs, including Teachers/KPs/SLs will definitely attract a lot of discussion. It is not a good way to proceed with discourse though.
Similarly, negative words like 'rubbish' or words intending to put people down, are also not useful.
Scrolling through the past few pages or so, there's nothing concrete discussed. Just people trying to rile each other.
So let's move on and talk about things that matter. And ignore any put-down posts that are biased and unproductive.
|
| Yesterday 02:38 PM |
| Unregistered |
True
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
because there is no reward for caring abt performance of specific students. just perform average and spend energy on gunning for KP ship. KPs are brazen enugh to even say nothing wrong with that.
|
Indeed.
This person with his/her inappropriate remark below really reflect this's person attitude and integrity towards work ethics. Mostly this person will brush off students persistent repeated questions as rubbish question.
Rubbish reply. Don't even need to explain. Self-explanatory
|
| Yesterday 12:50 PM |
| Unregistered |
indeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
because there is no reward for caring abt performance of specific students. just perform average and spend energy on gunning for KP ship. KPs are brazen enugh to even say nothing wrong with that.
|
Indeed. And based on this person response as per below. It reflects his/her attitude towards work ethics. If a student repeatedly asking the same question, then he/she most likely shrugged it off with this rubbish persistent question. I am being polite to refer as this person otherwise will be using the term retard.
[Rubbish reply. Don't even need to explain. Self-explanatory]
|
| Yesterday 08:58 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Rubbish reply. Point made on the original point was about stereotyping teachers as such. Perhaps u are too cognitively challenged to realise
|
How come it's wrong to stereotype teachers but it's OK to stereotype SLs and KPs?
|
| Yesterday 08:22 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Unfortunately I can back it up with my own experience of getting only 385 for MI AND PI going from GEO 3 -> 4, despite being 100 away from GEO 3 ceiling then, and with an A grade.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
To clarify, this was in Apr 2022, before salary adjustment. Double whammy of only 5% adjustment for Geo 4 in oct 2022.
|
interesting...based on past posts it seems like those promoted in 2022 were most disadvantaged...yet those promoted in 2021 got 9% adjustment
anyone tried clarifying with HR before?
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
