| Today 11:52 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
As far as the PTC goes it's probably not surprising if the pay stays the same for all 12 months without any external nudge from Lawsoc etc.
|
Actually the purpose of that document is to inform how they gonna structure the 1 year TC and what actually are the requirements to complete right? Not implying that they are gonna do it anyways, but why would they address pay there?
|
| Today 11:23 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol did anyone see that linkedin public apology by Nadine (nus law student) to Ethan Ong (ntu) posted today?
I guess we know who didn't win
|
This is the alcohol incident right. She got schooled about defamation law. Expensive experiential learning. She'd better get an A for her Advanced Torts module after this to make it worthwhile
|
| Today 11:00 AM |
| Unregistered |
Lol did anyone see that linkedin public apology by Nadine (nus law student) to Ethan Ong (ntu) posted today?
I guess we know who didn't win
|
| Yesterday 06:58 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
However, my point was not that. My point was on doing a stint (e.g. 3 months/6 months in-house, akin to a client secondment seat in the E&W TC programme) to which you will pick up commercial skills and understanding beyond (or more fully integrated with) legal, and communication/process management with the other functions in the company, which you can then bring back with you when you return to private practice (yes, more likely with an int'l firm than local firm) and then proceed to being a solid associate/SA who can resonate better with clients.
|
Ok yes. We don't disagree with your points, broadly speaking. This route can be useful for a fledging lawyer. It certainly won't be detrimental.
So go and find an arrangement that allows you to do such an in-house stint and thereafter bring your 6 month in-house experience back to private practice?
Not sure why you're trying so hard to convince us here about the merits of such a route? If you're so convinced that this route is advantageous and worth pursing on the merits, then just go do it? And I don't mean this sarcastically. I sincerely mean, if you truly believe in this route, then go for it.
|
| Yesterday 06:11 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Just read through SILE's consultation paper for the implementation of the new admission regime
It does not address pay at all? Are firms going to pay the same shitty pay for all 12 months of the PTC?
|
As far as the PTC goes it's probably not surprising if the pay stays the same for all 12 months without any external nudge from Lawsoc etc.
|
| Yesterday 06:07 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
What is the current monthly/annual benchmark for pay for fresh grads in legal service/big 4? Researching now since the expected salary will be a conversation during the hiring process, would like to hear some thoughts
|
Just read through SILE's consultation paper for the implementation of the new admission regime
It does not address pay at all? Are firms going to pay the same shitty pay for all 12 months of the PTC?
|
| Yesterday 05:59 PM |
| Unregistered |
What is the current monthly/annual benchmark for pay for fresh grads in legal service/big 4? Researching now since the expected salary will be a conversation during the hiring process, would like to hear some thoughts
|
| Yesterday 05:45 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Mans tryna prove a point to people he asked for advice from on an anonymous forum, who probably worked in the industry for years or decades and has more legal experience in their left nut than his entire existence.
i love this forum
|
To be fair, he's putting good points while you're just bashing him without substance. At least he puts out substance lol
Personally, I'm interested to hear more on this discussion
I didn't know there were so many in-house internships available for nus/smu kids lol
|
| Yesterday 05:37 PM |
| Unregistered |
Mans tryna prove a point to people he asked for advice from on an anonymous forum, who probably worked in the industry for years or decades and has more legal experience in their left nut than his entire existence.
i love this forum
|
| Yesterday 05:34 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
OP here once again. To further prove my point above that it is well-settled that law students have had the chance of benefiting from an in-house internship (and that the only way in is NOT just to go in after years of practice), and to persist in progressing this discussion in answering of my question above - for the benefit of all law students interested:
You can't tell me that:
1. Working at Tiger Airways wouldn't enable you to gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in asset/aviation finance/law.
2. Working at AON wouldn't enable you to gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in insurance brokerage/laws.
3. Working at Aramco wouldn't enable you to gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in oil and gas/project development/project finance/laws.
4. Working at Pavilion Capital wouldn't enable you to gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in fund formation/structuring/corporate laws.
|
1) You can gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in asset/aviation finance/law, just not as much as working in a law firm that specializes in this field.
2) You can gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in oil and gas/project development/project finance/laws, just not as much as working in a law firm that specializes in this field.
3) You can gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in oil and gas/project development/project finance/laws, just not as much as working in a law firm that specializes in this field.
4) You can gain legal and commercial experience/understanding in fund formation/structuring/corporate laws, just not as much as working in a law firm that specializes in this field.
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
