 |
|

07-01-2018, 11:52 AM
|
|
graduated from NUS 2007 with 2nd upper honours. NS. Working in one of the social ministries (MX scheme). Gross monthly $8100. 2017 annual pay package was $144k.
|

07-01-2018, 12:33 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
graduated from NUS 2007 with 2nd upper honours. NS. Working in one of the social ministries (MX scheme). Gross monthly $8100. 2017 annual pay package was $144k.
|
seriously, my GLC, staff with same qualification as you, or even scholar may not even hit 6.5k(with 4 promotions) basic after 10 years exp.
Some more you are from a lower profile ministry (ie social)
|

07-01-2018, 05:14 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
graduated from NUS 2007 with 2nd upper honours. NS. Working in one of the social ministries (MX scheme). Gross monthly $8100. 2017 annual pay package was $144k.
|
Were you in the govt sector all along?
|

07-01-2018, 08:32 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
graduated from NUS 2007 with 2nd upper honours. NS. Working in one of the social ministries (MX scheme). Gross monthly $8100. 2017 annual pay package was $144k.
|
Big cannon spotted!
|

07-01-2018, 09:46 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
seriously, my GLC, staff with same qualification as you, or even scholar may not even hit 6.5k(with 4 promotions) basic after 10 years exp.
Some more you are from a lower profile ministry (ie social)
|
Actually i am not sure if whether one is from a "high" profile ministry means your pay should be higher? Reason being Ministries all have MX schemes and they have to work with their own budget as allocated by MOF for bonuses, increments, promotions etc. Dont think the "high" profile ministries get more budget.
Stand corrected if there are HR/PSD experts in this forum.
|

07-01-2018, 09:50 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Were you in the govt sector all along?
|
yes. all along. thats correct.
|

07-01-2018, 09:51 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Leee
Big cannon spotted!
|
erm... no reason why i would give fake figures... I think i am doing slightly above average when compared to my peers in the organisation. But not sure how that fares when compared to the overall civil service
|

07-01-2018, 10:05 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
erm... no reason why i would give fake figures... I think i am doing slightly above average when compared to my peers in the organisation. But not sure how that fares when compared to the overall civil service
|
Can you provide your salary timeline
eg
2007 - fresh grad 2upper with ns - $xxxx, MX13
2008 - $xxxx - promoted to MX12 + annual increment
2009 - $xxxx - annual increment (AI)
2010 - $xxxx - AI + salary adjustment
2011 - $xxxx - AI + promotion to MX11
2012 -......etc
2017 - $8100 - MX(??)
|

07-01-2018, 10:46 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Can you provide your salary timeline
eg
2007 - fresh grad 2upper with ns - $xxxx, MX13
2008 - $xxxx - promoted to MX12 + annual increment
2009 - $xxxx - annual increment (AI)
2010 - $xxxx - AI + salary adjustment
2011 - $xxxx - AI + promotion to MX11
2012 -......etc
2017 - $8100 - MX(??)
|
cannot remember every year la. only remember my first starting and my current pay.
2007 - fresh grad 2upper with ns - $3280, MX13
2008 - MX 12 (promotion/confirmation)
2010 - MX 11(promotion)
2015 - MX 11a (promotion)
2017 - MX 11a
somewhere (can't recall which years) there was a review of MX schemes and there was a 5/10% increment across the board.
Fingers crossed that i will get my MX10 this 2018!
|

08-01-2018, 01:49 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Actually i am not sure if whether one is from a "high" profile ministry means your pay should be higher? Reason being Ministries all have MX schemes and they have to work with their own budget as allocated by MOF for bonuses, increments, promotions etc. Dont think the "high" profile ministries get more budget.
Stand corrected if there are HR/PSD experts in this forum.
|
HR here. You're slightly off. The 'high profile' Ministries do get a bigger budget to work with for bonuses and so on. But, the difference is negligible unless you are AD and above.
MSF is the worst funded of the lot. A fellow HR there complains to me that they don't even get enough funding to hire permanent staff for certain roles.
MFA is the best funded. Technically they don't have as big a budget as, say, MTI, but taking into account the low number of people in comparison to their budget, they probably have the best bonuses.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|