 |
|
02-04-2016, 05:57 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Your views
|
MI is dependent on both CEP and PRG
It is also possible for Person A (higher CEP, lower PRG) to have a higher MI than Person B (lower CEP, higher PRG)
|
02-04-2016, 07:42 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Moe GEO scheme. Performance grade C. MI only 1.8%.
|
Be happy with your increment. You had your oct increment last year, as well as MOE Connect plan etc and other benefits that other public officers do not have.
|
02-04-2016, 07:52 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
MI is dependent on both CEP and PRG
It is also possible for Person A (higher CEP, lower PRG) to have a higher MI than Person B (lower CEP, higher PRG)
|
Yes agree, MI dependent on CEP and perf grade.
It all depends on the situation; if CEP is currently higher than the current rank, the increment would be higher to spread out the salary increments. But perf grade will come in to provide greater differentiation.
|
03-04-2016, 08:32 AM
|
|
|
How does the salary differ for DXO, HTS and MX scheme?
|
03-04-2016, 10:55 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Would like to ask 9.24pm poster, I had B/promoted.This year I hv a C but my increment is substantially higher than when I had B. Your theory would then not support finding that higher grade (b) increment higher (than C)
|
9.24pm poster here (lol)...
As mentioned earlier by me and those who are familiar with how MI works, the following is expected:
2014 (MX12/B): $2xx (Got promoted. Exclude PI)
2015 (MX11/C): $2xx (Your CEP maintained but since you're in higher grade, your MI for MX11 is higher than MX12 even though you get C this year)
OR
2015 (MX11/C): $3xx (Your CEP has been upgraded to MX10 or MX9 so not only you receive higher MI because you're now in a higher grade, having an upgraded CEP entitles you to receive more MI)
|
03-04-2016, 01:35 PM
|
|
|
How attractive is economist service pay? What is the expected career progression?
|
03-04-2016, 02:27 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
9.24pm poster here (lol)...
As mentioned earlier by me and those who are familiar with how MI works, the following is expected:
2014 (MX12/B): $2xx (Got promoted. Exclude PI)
2015 (MX11/C): $2xx (Your CEP maintained but since you're in higher grade, your MI for MX11 is higher than MX12 even though you get C this year)
OR
2015 (MX11/C): $3xx (Your CEP has been upgraded to MX10 or MX9 so not only you receive higher MI because you're now in a higher grade, having an upgraded CEP entitles you to receive more MI)
|
how do you know ur increment in 2014 when you got promoted? i thought they lump increment and pi together.
|
03-04-2016, 02:32 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
How attractive is economist service pay? What is the expected career progression?
|
Pretty good, starting pay is in the 4.5k region for 2nd upper with NS. As for career progression, not so clear, but I do know that several years down the road, if you're at least an average performer in the scheme, you'll almost certainly get sponsored to do post-graduate studies, either Masters or Phd at good overseas institutions.
But it is quite a prestigious scheme of service in the government so expect it to be competitive.
Source: was invited to their career networking sessions
|
03-04-2016, 02:40 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
How attractive is economist service pay? What is the expected career progression?
|
4.9k for first class with ns. Atleast 200k p.a. in ur mid-late 30s, assuming u can keep pace with the retention CEP and not asked to leave.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
