Salary.sg Forums

Salary.sg Forums (https://forums.salary.sg/)
-   Income and Jobs (https://forums.salary.sg/income-jobs/)
-   -   Compare civil service salary (https://forums.salary.sg/income-jobs/885-compare-civil-service-salary.html)

Unregistered 03-04-2015 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64920)
Hi

I jus got promoted from MX 11 to 11a. My increment last year was abt 4% but tis year with the promotion, my increment is only 3.5%. I got B for both years and I have 17 years of working exp. Can anyone share why promotion increment is lesser than annual increment?

Thanks.


My guess is that you hit the salary ceiling for MX11 and hence, you were bumped up to MX11A.

Unregistered 03-04-2015 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64936)
32yo. NS. Just got promoted to MX10. Had been getting 400+ annual increment for the past few years as MX11 and MX11a.

Can anyone share what is the typical annual increment that I can expect in future as MX10?

You are clearly lying through your teeth! TROLL!!!!!

Firstly, its virtually impossible for a 32 yo NS to be MX10. If u can fast track so fast, u would be on the AO scheme, not MX. AOs will never ask how much their MI will be in this forum. Do u know how much they earn!!!! Secondly, based on previous threads, the MX11A grade was just introduced in Q3 last year. Ppl who were placed to the grade were informed. No increment. Hence, you couldn't have received a $400+ increment previously for your promotion to MX11A. Liar!!! A lot of trolls here who reply to themselves!!!

Unregistered 03-04-2015 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64954)
81xx.

Does that have an impact on the quantum of increment? I thought increments are determined based on absolute amounts rather than as a % of current salary.

The 32yo who claims he's MX10 earning 81×× is clearly lying. At MX10 who was leading a team since appointed to MX11, he should be have supervisory knowledge of increment quantums. MX10 is DD leh. How can donno!

Unregistered 03-04-2015 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64959)
You are clearly lying through your teeth! TROLL!!!!!

Firstly, its virtually impossible for a 32 yo NS to be MX10. If u can fast track so fast, u would be on the AO scheme, not MX. AOs will never ask how much their MI will be in this forum. Do u know how much they earn!!!! Secondly, based on previous threads, the MX11A grade was just introduced in Q3 last year. Ppl who were placed to the grade were informed. No increment. Hence, you couldn't have received a $400+ increment previously for your promotion to MX11A. Liar!!! A lot of trolls here who reply to themselves!!!

Apr 2012:
MX11 -> merit increment = $400+

Apr 2013:
MX11 -> merit increment = $400+

Apr 2014:
MX11 -> merit increment = $400+

Aug 2014:
Salary adjustment -> +5%
MX11A introduced -> emplacement increment = +$250


I am not on the AO scheme. I just turned MX10 this Apr.

I have nothing to gain by lying. You can, of course, choose not to believe me.

The intent of my original post was merely to find out how much the typical increment for MX10 is.

Unregistered 03-04-2015 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64960)
The 32yo who claims he's MX10 earning 81×× is clearly lying. At MX10 who was leading a team since appointed to MX11, he should be have supervisory knowledge of increment quantums. MX10 is DD leh. How can donno!

I am sure you know how varied the pegging of designations can be across CS. In my organisation, not all MX10s are DDs. There are ADs/SADs at MX10. I am not DD.

Also, in my organisation, the letters notifying staff of promotions and increments are sent only through the Dirs, not the DDs, and certainly not the ADs/SADs. Despite being a supervisor, I was only privy to the endorsed performance grades and PBs of my team. I know neither the current salaries nor increments of any of my staff.

Unregistered 03-04-2015 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64964)
I am sure you know how varied the pegging of designations can be across CS. In my organisation, not all MX10s are DDs. There are ADs/SADs at MX10. I am not DD.

Also, in my organisation, the letters notifying staff of promotions and increments are sent only through the Dirs, not the DDs, and certainly not the ADs/SADs. Despite being a supervisor, I was only privy to the endorsed performance grades and PBs of my team. I know neither the current salaries nor increments of any of my staff.

I'm MX11A and I hv more access to HR info than you. Perhaps you should consider a move to other ministries than coz if you are only AD/SAD, when ranked against DDs, you confirm kena C or C- every year. Your MI will also be lower. Other ministry you can become DD also. Better mah. That's assuming you're really MX10. Lol.

Unregistered 04-04-2015 12:07 AM

Some think they know it all and pass sweeping judgements based on limited experience. Ignorance is sad. It is worse to be ignorant of one's ignorance, and mistaken that one's limited "truth" is the be-all and end-all.

Unregistered 04-04-2015 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64924)
For stat boards that follow closely to ministry, do the 2Bs to promote rule still applies? I have conflicting responds. Some say 2Bs, some say no longer have such thing, 2C+ is sufficient. Need some confirmation here.

Instead of checking with your HR, you are asking a group of anonymous people on the internet for confirmation????

I'll be really surprised if you can even get a C

Unregistered 04-04-2015 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64975)
Instead of checking with your HR, you are asking a group of anonymous people on the internet for confirmation????

I'll be really surprised if you can even get a C

ppl generally scared of HR mah

Unregistered 04-04-2015 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 64933)
30. 3 years service.

How many yrs work exp in all? What class hon?


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2