 |
|
12-08-2020, 11:11 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
MAC, as the name suggests, is adjusted based on Market performance. Given that the market is doing badly, just be happy that there is no cut to the base pay. Instead, I feel that the MAC should be a negative component and be cut against the basic wages for engineers. In good years you get more, lousy years your pay should be cut. That's fairer.
|
good analogy. agree that the elite should bear higher consequences during time of crisis. well said!
|
13-08-2020, 12:37 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
yup, actually this is my last MAC before transferring to another agency who offer specialised scheme with bulit-in higher base pay.
anyway, HR told me MAC is not 100% cancel yet, it is just postpone to end of the year. I can still proceed to transfer as plan and it will not affect the payout.
|
Good for you then. If so what's the point of coming this forum to post so much about non-payment of MAC? Too free ah? Lol.
|
13-08-2020, 01:56 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Good for you then. If so what's the point of coming this forum to post so much about non-payment of MAC? Too free ah? Lol.
|
no la. defer to dec also not 100% will get. and i am expecting it in Aug until the recent news on the defer.
damn irritated.
|
13-08-2020, 04:10 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
does it mean that only engineers need to bear the bad economic outlook?
not to forgot most engineers are also essential service staff and are working on the ground, not management staff
|
Agree with this. Really unfair that most of us engineers are working tirelessly some even on site during cb period and didn't receive our MAC. It was introduced as a form of retaining specialised skills in IT, engineering etc. and by not giving won't it defeats the purpose in retaining these skills? I foresee a number of engineers leaving due to this.[/QUOTE]
As mentioned by another guy, you are free to quit if you feel that the compensation is too low. The fact that most of the engineers are staying shows that the current compensation package is adequate to retain them. So why should govt pay?
|
13-08-2020, 12:03 PM
|
|
|
Masters in Psychology; Overseas uni.
3 years relevant working experience. Offered by SB $4600. Doing HR / Org Development work.
Is this base salary a good offer?
For advise, please. Thank you.
|
13-08-2020, 12:49 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Masters in Psychology; Overseas uni.
3 years relevant working experience. Offered by SB $4600. Doing HR / Org Development work.
Is this base salary a good offer?
For advise, please. Thank you.
|
To advise better, could you let us know your age, whether you served NS, local/pte/overseas University for degree and last drawn pay.
|
13-08-2020, 01:14 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
To advise better, could you let us know your age, whether you served NS, local/pte/overseas University for degree and last drawn pay. |
30 year old. 3 years relevant working experience.
Served NS.
Overseas Uni.
Last drawn was $4450. Just been offered $4600. i.e. 3% increase in base pay.
HR / Org Development work.
Is this base salary a good offer?
For advise, please. Thank you.
|
13-08-2020, 03:25 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
30 year old. 3 years relevant working experience.
Served NS.
Overseas Uni.
Last drawn was $4450. Just been offered $4600. i.e. 3% increase in base pay.
HR / Org Development work.
Is this base salary a good offer?
For advise, please. Thank you. |
My view is that it's decent and nothing out of norm. You should also compare the yearly package vs previous job for better comparison.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
