Lawyer Salary

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Now news say got 11 liao. Not just 6.

Hope we can have another high court judge to look into this. Or are they just birds of the same feather ah?

More interested to see what Shanmugam, Adrian tan will say about this scandal. Those LinkedIn top voices suddenly so quiet, looking at you, Ms. TSMP. Even Lim Tean so quiet also

Hi, I received a TC from A&G in their M&A department. Is this a good place to go to in terms of career progression/opportunities because a lot of my friends have been saying that it's a terrible place. If anyone has any insights, I'd appreciate it!

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Hi, I received a TC from A&G in their M&A department. Is this a good place to go to in terms of career progression/opportunities because a lot of my friends have been saying that it's a terrible place. If anyone has any insights, I'd appreciate it!

Haha what a troll. A&G hasn't even opened applications for TC this year.

I actually got it last year but the question is the same because I'm wondering if I should change department/firm lol.....

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Haha what a troll. A&G hasn't even opened applications for TC this year.

I actually got it last year but the question is the same because I'm wondering if I should change department/firm lol.....

Originally Posted by Unregistered

CHT also said “They are loathe to shut the door on a wrongdoer with no prospects of redemption. But they also have a duty to prevent a repeat of the wrong, and to do so without breaking young backs in the process.”

“But second chances are for those who seize them. If ever they were to plead for a third, I wish them good luck.”

Can we also apply this to rapists, drug smugglers, kidnappers and murderers too, if they are young

Guy really just compared earning a professional license with rapists and murderers.

Those who cheated, by reason of case laws and statutory principles from the LPA, should be entirely barred from the legal profession.

Whilst it is recognised that the cheaters are not subject to the rules from LPA, they are entering a profession with the highest standard of integrity and thus the rules that apply to legal professionals should also apply to them.

There are also policy reasons for doing so - to uphold the public’s trust in our legal profession and to strongly discourage future candidates from doing so.

We should also maintain fairness to those who achieved the results through their sheer hard work. Those who tried to go through the easy path through blatantly and dishonestly disregarding the rules should be punished for their actions.

I hope the Court will do a thorough review on this and punish the wrongdoers fairly.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Those who cheated, by reason of case laws and statutory principles from the LPA, should be entirely barred from the legal profession.

Whilst it is recognised that the cheaters are not subject to the rules from LPA, they are entering a profession with the highest standard of integrity and thus the rules that apply to legal professionals should also apply to them.

There are also policy reasons for doing so - to uphold the public’s trust in our legal profession and to strongly discourage future candidates from doing so.

We should also maintain fairness to those who achieved the results through their sheer hard work. Those who tried to go through the easy path through blatantly and dishonestly disregarding the rules should be punished for their actions.

I hope the Court will do a thorough review on this and punish the wrongdoers fairly.

Who are the wrongdoers? Sic names

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Those who cheated, by reason of case laws and statutory principles from the LPA, should be entirely barred from the legal profession.

Whilst it is recognised that the cheaters are not subject to the rules from LPA, they are entering a profession with the highest standard of integrity and thus the rules that apply to legal professionals should also apply to them.

There are also policy reasons for doing so - to uphold the public’s trust in our legal profession and to strongly discourage future candidates from doing so.

We should also maintain fairness to those who achieved the results through their sheer hard work. Those who tried to go through the easy path through blatantly and dishonestly disregarding the rules should be punished for their actions.

I hope the Court will do a thorough review on this and punish the wrongdoers fairly.

i disagree. why deprive them of chance to practise?
i mean lawyers are not known to be the most honest profession.

By admitting these six new lawyers to the bar, the law profession mediocre integrity will be truly and correctly reflected. This benefits the public actually. As the public is now reminded of the mediocre integrity, and may exercise due diligence.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

No gag order and Choo j can't anyhow impose a gag order on this case. On what basis? Can name and shame them ah

U want people like them to settle your divorce case? Or to fight for Ur defamation case? Eh they may have taken bribe from the opposition and purposely makes u lose Ur case. Issit got white horse among these 6?

If a judge's verdict is not neutral, I think we shd get AI to help in judgment. Papa Choo too kind and loving liao.

Choo is smart. Why kill off the 6 by himself? The court of public opinion will kill them off later. Plus, he gets to look like a kind and loving papa.