 |
|
25-11-2021, 03:29 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol, can’t believe those are your go to names
|
He’s clearly trying to plug for bclp. so which inf firms are good for dispute reso???
|
25-11-2021, 06:31 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
He’s clearly trying to plug for bclp. so which inf firms are good for dispute reso???
|
Check chambers.com
|
25-11-2021, 06:33 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
He’s clearly trying to plug for bclp. so which inf firms are good for dispute reso???
|
Wanjing ah wanjing
|
25-11-2021, 07:12 PM
|
|
|
LMAO Don't so insecure la all of you. 99% of you Big 4 or local sinkie firm lawyers will drop your pants and agree to be s odomised for a place in BCLP or Dechert.
|
26-11-2021, 09:36 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
He’s clearly trying to plug for bclp. so which inf firms are good for dispute reso???
|
Baker best expanding hard!
|
26-11-2021, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
how long do law firms take to get back to ppl after interviews? if it's been one week and no response, does that mean you've been ghosted or do they at least email to reject you?
|
26-11-2021, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
Anyone read the study found here on senior counsel performance - s://melvinmok.com/writing/senior-counsel-appeals
I found it interesting. It was well-researched but incomplete and subjective so I would take the conclusions with a huge dose of salt. If only someone could do some form of sensible data set across the entire profession to allow for principled differentiation between lawyers and law firms and for us to know who in the market actually deserves their reputation and how much of it is pure marketing. So we can avoid all of the rubbish we see in the forums, including this one. It would also be nice to have an honest data-based assessment of our lawyers, law firms any day over self-glorifying arbitrary and meaningless legal awards that are a dime a dozen nowadays. It would also save me time from having to read the repeated humblebrags about how humbled some random lawyer is awarded yet another questionable legal award or ranking they pestered clients to nominate them for.
|
26-11-2021, 12:55 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
He’s clearly trying to plug for bclp. so which inf firms are good for dispute reso???
|
Freshfields, CC, A&O, HSF come to mind.
Probably would only use them for high-value multijurisdictional cross-border arbitrations though.
CC can litigate in Singapore due to Cavanagh law tie-up.
|
26-11-2021, 04:19 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Freshfields, CC, A&O, HSF come to mind.
Probably would only use them for high-value multijurisdictional cross-border arbitrations though.
CC can litigate in Singapore due to Cavanagh law tie-up.
|
Freshfields Singapore don't waste time. Don't do very much. A&O is satellite for HK. CC is OK, HSF just for arbi work very niche. Baker these days seem be doing interesting work. Dechert is actually not bad, better than Jones day. Mayer Brown also zzz.
|
26-11-2021, 07:20 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OceanFinanxial
Freshfields Singapore don't waste time. Don't do very much. A&O is satellite for HK. CC is OK, HSF just for arbi work very niche. Baker these days seem be doing interesting work. Dechert is actually not bad, better than Jones day. Mayer Brown also zzz.
|
"Baker these days seem be doing interesting work"
What a joke
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
