Lawyer Salary

Originally Posted by Unregistered

which of the big 4 has the highest starting pay after A&G?

Doesn’t really matter, it’s all around the same. No point comparing peanuts of a few hundred dollars. The real comparison is with UK firms and US firms.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

which of the big 4 has the highest starting pay after A&G?

Hm is A&G paying

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Doesn’t really matter, it’s all around the same. No point comparing peanuts of a few hundred dollars. The real comparison is with UK firms and US firms.

CC vs Baker how much? Is Baker (not IP) hiring in general? Other than the two, which firms pay >8K? I don't really care about the FLAs that match Big 4 as they are generally a lower tier

Ya i have no time to argue with you. I am busy being set for life as I am a Harvard grad. All of you plebians asking for salary figures please go get a Harvard grad degree as I am immune to the job market and do not care about the unemployed persons from lower tier schools

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Can someone confirm this?

From R&T and can confirm. But my colleagues can attest to it when I say that the bonus isn’t spectacular.

Can't wait for law school to become a dumping ground for poly kia and A level failure. Probably will be the next FASS. Graduate pay will be alongside general degrees in the next GES. While law grads are getting conned to work 6 months for MacDonald wages and 6 months + $7k to get a toilet paper pc, your friends who had a blast in uni and graduating with 3rd class would have surpassed you all.

Agreed. If it is not for all the people in the lower tier schools, I would not have been working at a small firm for the past two years despite graduating from a first tier school. Honestly I believe we obviously have better capacity and skill set and opportunities should be given to us. Lateral hires to big four and international firms would have been more simple for us if it is not for these under-performers.

They should only have the first tier graduates fighting for the same jobs from the outset.

Society is fair, the high achievers and the qualified ones like people from the higher tier schools should not be undermined by those underachievers.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Agreed. If it is not for all the people in the lower tier schools, I would not have been working at a small firm for the past two years despite graduating from a first tier school. Honestly I believe we obviously have better capacity and skill set and opportunities should be given to us. Lateral hires to big four and international firms would have been more simple for us if it is not for these under-performers.

They should only have the first tier graduates fighting for the same jobs from the outset.

Society is fair, the high achievers and the qualified ones like people from the higher tier schools should not be undermined by those underachievers.

This post is cute. You are from a "first tier school" and somehow it's the "people in the lower tier schools" preventing you from getting the jobs you want? Clearly, you messed up big time in your degree and graduated far far away from the top half of the class. You're not "first tier" just because of your school name. You 2nd lower has brought you way down. I'm so happy that the partners who rejected you see through your ******** - you are worse in every way than those graduates from "lower tier schools".

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Agreed. If it is not for all the people in the lower tier schools, I would not have been working at a small firm for the past two years despite graduating from a first tier school. Honestly I believe we obviously have better capacity and skill set and opportunities should be given to us. Lateral hires to big four and international firms would have been more simple for us if it is not for these under-performers.

They should only have the first tier graduates fighting for the same jobs from the outset.

Society is fair, the high achievers and the qualified ones like people from the higher tier schools should not be undermined by those underachievers.

This is either really good satire or someone reallyyyy bitter about their second lower lmao.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Agreed. If it is not for all the people in the lower tier schools, I would not have been working at a small firm for the past two years despite graduating from a first tier school. Honestly I believe we obviously have better capacity and skill set and opportunities should be given to us. Lateral hires to big four and international firms would have been more simple for us if it is not for these under-performers.

They should only have the first tier graduates fighting for the same jobs from the outset.

Society is fair, the high achievers and the qualified ones like people from the higher tier schools should not be undermined by those underachievers.

Because some rich people dumb kids not smart enough to get into NUS, have to pay-to-win in some UK/Aus school who probably accepted them for 'student diversity' and not merit. Should debar all foreign grad and delist all foreign unis. Sack the committee of supply as well, 0 foresight