Lawyer Salary - Page 379 - Salary.sg Forums
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Lawyer Salary

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #3781 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-2018, 11:09 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Hello,

I'm on 7k a month with the rest being bonus.

I have a very good relationship with my ex-boss and i don't think it will be a problem for me to go back to private practice - but be clear that this will not be based on any kind of merit, it is very much based on connection (and our past working relationship, which was very good). I left practice because i felt i was being severely undervalued/underpaid (nothing to do with the boss mentioned above, just the culture in general). I'm currently on slightly less than twice what i used to earn and possibly a thousand more than what i would be earning had i remained in practice.

I miss practice a lot. The difference in terms of intellectual rigor is great - a lot of what i do is very much people management as opposed to hardcore legal work.

My welcome to this company was marred in equal part by the culture shock and steep learning (being the politics and people management) curve. The role of legal counsel requires you to work with many different people on a daily basis, each with their own agenda (most of the times not even hidden). It is like being thrown in a wolf's den because you know they are only working with you so they can throw you under the bus if anything blows up. It takes a certain finesse to maintain the tenuous balance between keeping people (remember that there is usually more than one person on any deal) happy and making the legally correct calls.

It is also a very lonely role - you should be used to making judgment calls on a daily basis. If you call your GC for approval on decisions often, the likelihood is that you won't have a job for much longer.

I think if you can find a firm that truly values your talents and skills and is willing to investment in your learning and progression, it is worthwhile to continue in practice. I sometimes think that if i had met seniors who were kinder (and more generous with teaching and mentoring) and firms that truly believe in the potential of their people, I would've stayed for a long time. Unfortunately, a lot of seniors are just plain assholes.

Good luck!
Thanks for sharing

Sorry if i misread, but you were making abt 3.5k at 2 year pqe? Or 14k?

Reply With Quote
  #3782 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-2018, 11:12 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Sorry, do you mean "a thousand less"?

Also, I'm surprised you're taking in "only" (I say this with caution, of course) $7k/month before bonuses. I always heard that in-house offers match your current pay in private practice but simply freeze your pay progression for a number of years. I didn't expect one could take >50% paycut for moving to in-house...
Not sure if i read right

I thought he meant he used to earn abt 3.5k and it doubled when he went in house

Not sure why anyone would take a 50% paycut

Or who is earning 14k at 2y pqe

Reply With Quote
  #3783 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-2018, 03:11 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Not sure if i read right

I thought he meant he used to earn abt 3.5k and it doubled when he went in house

Not sure why anyone would take a 50% paycut

Or who is earning 14k at 2y pqe

Pretty sure it's this.

Reply With Quote
  #3784 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-2018, 05:34 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Pretty sure it's this.
More like he used to earn $4k in private practice as an NQ, and got poached in-house for $7k, which is $1k less than double of his old paycheck.
Reply With Quote
  #3785 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-2018, 07:13 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
More like he used to earn $4k in private practice as an NQ, and got poached in-house for $7k, which is $1k less than double of his old paycheck.
Ya sounds correct

From the way he wrote i guess he's in liti

Given what he was earning I guess in a smallish firm

Not a bad dec to go in house i guess
Reply With Quote
  #3786 (permalink)  
Old 15-11-2018, 03:32 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Anyone concerned about the recent proposal to scale fees in litigation / limit our earnings? Will this cause a drop in the salary of litigation associates?

Personally I think this will affect the small-mid firms the most who do the bulk of low-mid value litigation work. For high value litigation work, the rewards are still there e.g. for a 10m claim the cap is about $140k (still lower than now of course). Also doesn't affect international arbitration.

Is it still viable to go into liti?
Reply With Quote

  #3787 (permalink)  
Old 15-11-2018, 07:04 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Anyone concerned about the recent proposal to scale fees in litigation / limit our earnings? Will this cause a drop in the salary of litigation associates?

Personally I think this will affect the small-mid firms the most who do the bulk of low-mid value litigation work. For high value litigation work, the rewards are still there e.g. for a 10m claim the cap is about $140k (still lower than now of course). Also doesn't affect international arbitration.

Is it still viable to go into liti?
I agree that it will largely affect the small-mid firms. The fees are still no where near high enough for "high value" litigation work. Fees in a big firm for a 10mn file can range from 600k to 1m. The difference is that clients who require "high value" work are far more likely to agree to exclude scaled fees.

What I think will be the end result would be further stratification of the legal profession. As fees for the small to mid firms go down, these firms will push down their juniors salaries. Coupled with the new rules on qualification, the legal profession will become less and less of an attractive proposition. This will eventually lead to a lack of juniors. We'd become more and more like the HK legal market. Probably not the intended result.
Reply With Quote
  #3788 (permalink)  
Old 15-11-2018, 11:24 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
More like he used to earn $4k in private practice as an NQ, and got poached in-house for $7k, which is $1k less than double of his old paycheck.
Lol, no. He meant he used to earn probably about $3.5k in practice, and was poached in-house for probably around $6.5k (which is slightly less than twice what he used to earn i.e. $3.5k).

After spending some time working in-house, \with salary increments, he is earning $7k now, which he thinks should be $1k more than what he would have been earning if he stayed in practice (i.e. his pay would have only gone up to $6k in private practice, in the same time he has spent in-house).
Reply With Quote
  #3789 (permalink)  
Old 16-11-2018, 12:50 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Anyone concerned about the recent proposal to scale fees in litigation / limit our earnings? Will this cause a drop in the salary of litigation associates?

Personally I think this will affect the small-mid firms the most who do the bulk of low-mid value litigation work. For high value litigation work, the rewards are still there e.g. for a 10m claim the cap is about $140k (still lower than now of course). Also doesn't affect international arbitration.

Is it still viable to go into liti?
I think Shen Yi's article on law watch today sums it up well. Either go to international firms and do arbitration, or leave the litigation bar entirely. Seriously planning to move before the reforms kick in.
Reply With Quote
  #3790 (permalink)  
Old 16-11-2018, 01:07 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I agree that it will largely affect the small-mid firms. The fees are still no where near high enough for "high value" litigation work. Fees in a big firm for a 10mn file can range from 600k to 1m. The difference is that clients who require "high value" work are far more likely to agree to exclude scaled fees.

What I think will be the end result would be further stratification of the legal profession. As fees for the small to mid firms go down, these firms will push down their juniors salaries. Coupled with the new rules on qualification, the legal profession will become less and less of an attractive proposition. This will eventually lead to a lack of juniors. We'd become more and more like the HK legal market. Probably not the intended result.
This seems to be the end result of the legal industry in a lot of developed markets - the US legal profession is also highly stratified with two humps.

https://www.biglawinvestor.com/bimod...ibution-curve/

i.e get good or get out before its too late - other industries are more forgiving
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
advocate, law, lawyer, legal, solicitor

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From Lawyer Insider: Life is Glamorous but Unsatisfying Salary.sg Income and Jobs 31 15-01-2018 12:40 PM

» 30 Recent Threads
Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
15,326 Replies, 4,985,865 Views
Shopee fresh grad pay ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,051 Replies, 440,926 Views
Roles in accenture singapore ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
7,386 Replies, 2,325,312 Views
Civil Service Current Estimated... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
172 Replies, 309,782 Views
LTA (Land Transport Authority) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
681 Replies, 389,180 Views
Compare civil service salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
16,346 Replies, 12,459,262 Views
MAS for Mid Career Professionals ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,807 Replies, 1,045,803 Views
Career as Teacher ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
10,857 Replies, 6,673,640 Views
GovTech ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
5,164 Replies, 2,165,387 Views
UOB Management Associate Program ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,459 Replies, 785,108 Views
NCS (SingTel subsidiary) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,331 Replies, 1,142,768 Views
ITE Polytechnic Scheme ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
311 Replies, 369,608 Views
Why Is Having a Google Virtual...
1 Replies, 6,803 Views
How is life as a doctor in... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
7,240 Replies, 3,400,303 Views
JP Morgan ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
199 Replies, 173,556 Views
Mining Industry ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
80 Replies, 74,562 Views
Civil Service Performance Bonus ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
5,340 Replies, 4,773,609 Views
Lawyer Salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
21,015 Replies, 10,332,281 Views
ST Electronics ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,768 Replies, 1,545,674 Views
Is getting a PMP worth it ?
4 Replies, 7,183 Views
Visa Graduate Development Program ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
207 Replies, 134,763 Views
SIM-UOL fresh grad starting pay ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
6,922 Replies, 2,903,796 Views
Nparks ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
39 Replies, 34,449 Views
MINDEF DXO (All FAQ on it) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
5,828 Replies, 4,657,978 Views
Constituency Manager (People... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
989 Replies, 814,094 Views
Julius Baer Graduate Program 2023 ( 1 2 3)
21 Replies, 14,860 Views
HTX (Home Team Science and... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
752 Replies, 359,004 Views
DSTA (under Mindef) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,464 Replies, 1,375,990 Views
IMDA (under MCI) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,260 Replies, 614,019 Views
Civil Svc/ Statboard - Typical... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
6,123 Replies, 3,739,824 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2