Lawyer Salary

Originally Posted by Unregistered

All Aussie and NZ unis should also be scrapped, with the exception of Melb/UNSW.

So if you can't beat them, get daddy to do it for you. Isn't that right?

Beat them on your own merits, you incompetent fool.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

SILE should just continue to delist more universities from the UK list.

Notts, Birmingham, Warwick, Queen Mary, Bristol.,. Shitty unis that should be removed.

You sound like a jaded local law grad with no prospects of partnership at the firm you're at, jealous of your peers from these unis who have done infinitely better than you. Suck it up buddy.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

SILE should just continue to delist more universities from the UK list.

Notts, Birmingham, Warwick, Queen Mary, Bristol.,. Shitty unis that should be removed.

well said, only UK unis that should remain in the list are Cambridge, LSE, UCL, Durham, Oxford. Rest should be delisted

Originally Posted by Unregistered

well said, only UK unis that should remain in the list are Cambridge, LSE, UCL, Durham, Oxford. Rest should be delisted

Incels alert.

This is why Singapore lawyers with these types of attitude will never reach the height of UK lawyers.

In London, there is no protectionist measures to baby you and make sure no one can/will steal your job. Over there, if you're good, you're good- regardless of which uni you went to.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Incels alert.

This is why Singapore lawyers with these types of attitude will never reach the height of UK lawyers.

In London, there is no protectionist measures to baby you and make sure no one can/will steal your job. Over there, if you're good, you're good- regardless of which uni you went to.

Then overseas grads should just stay overseas and compete in those open, anti-protectionist legal markets. Why run back to enjoy the benefits of the very protectionist market you so despise? Your inability to grasp the irony and paradoxical nature of your arguments is a testament to the subpar quality of overseas law grads.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

You sound like a jaded local law grad with no prospects of partnership at the firm you're at, jealous of your peers from these unis who have done infinitely better than you. Suck it up buddy.

Based on my own personal experience working with trainees from Local U like NUS and comparing them to trainees from Bristol/Warwick/Birmingham, can confirm that the difference in skill is suffocatingly huge and I would pick a NUS law grad over any of those unis any day, no hesitation.

I have seen trainees from UCL/LSE/Durham who exceeded my expectations and perform even better than those from NUS on certain occasions but since I have only met a few of them the sample size is too small to give a qualified comment in general.

They definitely need to delist those subpar unis.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Incels alert.

This is why Singapore lawyers with these types of attitude will never reach the height of UK lawyers.

In London, there is no protectionist measures to baby you and make sure no one can/will steal your job. Over there, if you're good, you're good- regardless of which uni you went to.

I heard the exact same thing coming out of the mouth from a law grad from a delisted uni before.

Wow the insecurity of local grads, as a local grad myself this is just embarrassing to read. This is a salary forum, stick to salaries retards.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

SILE should just continue to delist more universities from the UK list.

Notts, Birmingham, Warwick, Queen Mary, Bristol.,. Shitty unis that should be removed.

This reeks of someone who has never left Sg

Is it true that the CC trainees this year are from NUS / Oxbridge / LSE?