|
|
22-12-2022, 05:13 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
(1) Duxton Hill Chambers isnt a law firm - the lawyers there are all independent and practise out of either a sole proprietorship or under a small firm of 1/2 of them.
(2) Which boutique only hires JLCs?
(3) The point on judges being unintentionally/inherently prejudiced to favour JLCs (I'm assuming when the JLCs are in practice) seems to be bothering on contempt.
|
For (2), prob Audent only. But its a really small sample size. Even Duxton has one non FCH/JLC member. CC is probably the closest you get to an all FCH/JLC team, but I don't think it is 100%.
For rest of the top liti or SC teams (DS, CAB, WP CCD, R&T IA/A&I/R&I, A&G, TSMP, Providence Law) there's plenty of non-FCH/non-JLC folks around.
|
22-12-2022, 05:15 PM
|
|
Lol I think we can all debate until the cows come home on this subject.
My 2 cents worth - JLC is a marker of prestige in lawyerdom because so few get it. A bit like an Oxon BCL.
Will anyone seriously suggest that it's a negative for one's legal career? Of course not.
Does this "prestige" translate to real tangible career value? Especially if you consider the 2 year opportunity cost? Unclear. There are so many other factors which potentially contribute to whether one's career succeeds or not.
|
22-12-2022, 05:24 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol I think we can all debate until the cows come home on this subject.
My 2 cents worth - JLC is a marker of prestige in lawyerdom because so few get it. A bit like an Oxon BCL.
Will anyone seriously suggest that it's a negative for one's legal career? Of course not.
Does this "prestige" translate to real tangible career value? Especially if you consider the 2 year opportunity cost? Unclear. There are so many other factors which potentially contribute to whether one's career succeeds or not.
|
Most lawyers in private practice only regard proper undergrad Oxbridge lawyers with that prestige of an “oxford / cantab Man”.. not the NUS + Oxon BCL path.
|
23-12-2022, 12:10 PM
|
|
Job hopping
How frowned upon would it be by employers?
2PQE and I’m in with firm #04. Regretably I’ve had 2 short stints in two small firms lasting < 3 months. My current pay is slightly below 5k.
I did 1 year with one of the firms I was in out of the 4.
I have been in my current firm (#04) for more than 7 months and while it is peaceful, remuneration is unsustainable in long run. I feel like I’ve taken too low of a salary and have ruined my career.
I’m thinking of reapplying again when I’m close to completing a year in March/Apr for better prospects as I’ve pigeonholed myself in the small-mid firms throughout my career.
Should I apply to bigger firms in Jan if I look to start in June/July?
|
23-12-2022, 12:13 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
How frowned upon would it be by employers?
2PQE and I’m in with firm #04. Regretably I’ve had 2 short stints in two small firms lasting < 3 months. My current pay is slightly below 5k.
I did 1 year with one of the firms I was in out of the 4.
I have been in my current firm (#04) for more than 7 months and while it is peaceful, remuneration is unsustainable in long run. I feel like I’ve taken too low of a salary and have ruined my career.
I’m thinking of reapplying again when I’m close to completing a year in March/Apr for better prospects as I’ve pigeonholed myself in the small-mid firms throughout my career.
Should I apply to bigger firms in Jan if I look to start in June/July?
|
Any good reasons for leaving firms #1 to #3?
|
23-12-2022, 12:21 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Any good reasons for leaving firms #1 to #3?
|
OP here.
Small Firm A was extremely toxic. Very abusive and you were dumped in the deep end. I was marked already from day 1. Everybody leaves and quits. Work was just a living nightmare. Probably got PTSD from the workplace. Everybody sabos each other.
Small Firm B was well, a mismatch of practice areas.
I joined current firm #04, as they offered a position in the area which I truly wanted. (Sorry I won’t say what as it will reveal myself), but the area I truly am interested in.
I spent 1 year at mid size A as well I had ties there, but the paltry allowance was well paltry.
|
23-12-2022, 12:23 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
OP here.
Small Firm A was extremely toxic. Very abusive and you were dumped in the deep end. I was marked already from day 1. Everybody leaves and quits. Work was just a living nightmare. Probably got PTSD from the workplace. Everybody sabos each other.
Small Firm B was well, a mismatch of practice areas.
I joined current firm #04, as they offered a position in the area which I truly wanted. (Sorry I won’t say what as it will reveal myself), but the area I truly am interested in.
I spent 1 year at mid size A as well I had ties there, but the paltry allowance was well paltry.
|
Are you from local or overseas uni? Passed Part A and B on first try?
|
23-12-2022, 12:24 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Are you from local or overseas uni? Passed Part A and B on first try?
|
Overseas. First try for both no resits.
FCH, qualified in another jurisdiction
|
23-12-2022, 12:29 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Overseas. First try for both no resits.
FCH, qualified in another jurisdiction
|
Looks good bro - it’s likely that your PQE is what will draw up issues
Any good reason why you didn’t want to go for big 4 for your first 2 firms?
They’re likely to ask you that - because if work life balance is what you were after from the beginning, they’re bound to ask you that why a change of mind
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|