Lawyer Salary - Page 1652 - Salary.sg Forums
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Lawyer Salary

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16511 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 04:55 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The cheating issue is very serious - how is this fair to those who have studied hard to pass? Let's work together to name these people.

Reply With Quote
  #16512 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 05:00 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
The cheating issue is very serious - how is this fair to those who have studied hard to pass? Let's work together to name these people.
Curious - is there a way for members of the law society to write a letter to the Court to express our opinions regarding how these people should not get called?

Reply With Quote
  #16513 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 05:23 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Law soc is now saying they will carefully review the applications.
But why makes things so difficult for our new colleagues???

Give them a chance. Twenties still young
Havent mature yet. Cheat a little bit is okie
Why so harsh

Reply With Quote
  #16514 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 06:13 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Charles Yeo is saying that some of the cheaters are from NUS and some are not? He also referred to their law firms in very cryptic terms? The suspense!
Reply With Quote
  #16515 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 06:19 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Law soc is now saying they will carefully review the applications.
But why makes things so difficult for our new colleagues???

Give them a chance. Twenties still young
Havent mature yet. Cheat a little bit is okie
Why so harsh
Give them a chance to mature their cheating skills. Bar exam cheating no kick. Let them become lawyers and do a David Rasif, that’s the gold standard!
Reply With Quote
  #16516 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 06:38 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Give them a chance to mature their cheating skills. Bar exam cheating no kick. Let them become lawyers and do a David Rasif, that’s the gold standard!
David rasif is amateurish. A pitiful 4mil client monies
We need jho low - $10billion usd
Reply With Quote

  #16517 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 06:50 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was one of the part b candidates who passed the exams through my own hard work without any help during the exam, like many others. We had the choice of communicating with each other during the exam, but chose not to because we held on to the integrity of the profession that we were about to join. I would also rather use any extra time to figure out my own answers rather than to seek answers from someone else.

I am naturally disheartened and find it extremely difficult to reconcile with the outcome, that the cheaters have been left unscathed by their dishonest mistakes. This is no way fair to candidates who respect and hold on to the integrity of the profession. If they can cheat and be left unscathed (delaying their call by 6-12 months is nothing), then what makes you think they will not do it again in future? They need to be held to the same standard as the standard which applies to the profession they are entering into. I am afraid those peers of mine, like myself, are mature and capable enough of making our own informed decisions of whether to cheat or to value integrity. I am afraid they are not young teens anymore. They are clearly not fit and proper for the legal profession.

My peers and I would gratefully appreciate any advice on how we can ensure that the cheaters, who clearly show signs of dishonest at such an early stage, are being disbarred from entering into the profession, or at least being named.
Reply With Quote
  #16518 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 07:10 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I was one of the part b candidates who passed the exams through my own hard work without any help during the exam, like many others. We had the choice of communicating with each other during the exam, but chose not to because we held on to the integrity of the profession that we were about to join. I would also rather use any extra time to figure out my own answers rather than to seek answers from someone else.

I am naturally disheartened and find it extremely difficult to reconcile with the outcome, that the cheaters have been left unscathed by their dishonest mistakes. This is no way fair to candidates who respect and hold on to the integrity of the profession. If they can cheat and be left unscathed (delaying their call by 6-12 months is nothing), then what makes you think they will not do it again in future? They need to be held to the same standard as the standard which applies to the profession they are entering into. I am afraid those peers of mine, like myself, are mature and capable enough of making our own informed decisions of whether to cheat or to value integrity. I am afraid they are not young teens anymore. They are clearly not fit and proper for the legal profession.

My peers and I would gratefully appreciate any advice on how we can ensure that the cheaters, who clearly show signs of dishonest at such an early stage, are being disbarred from entering into the profession, or at least being named.
TLDR: I want to know which firms are going to have NQ vacancies.
Reply With Quote
  #16519 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 07:17 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I was one of the part b candidates who passed the exams through my own hard work without any help during the exam, like many others. We had the choice of communicating with each other during the exam, but chose not to because we held on to the integrity of the profession that we were about to join. I would also rather use any extra time to figure out my own answers rather than to seek answers from someone else.
all this talk about the "choice" of doing something dishonest ... reminds me of some of the points made in the COP proceedings.
Reply With Quote
  #16520 (permalink)  
Old 20-04-2022, 07:23 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
My peers and I would gratefully appreciate any advice on how we can ensure that the cheaters, who clearly show signs of dishonest at such an early stage, are being disbarred from entering into the profession, or at least being named.
File an affidavit objecting under rule 28. Practically though you would need to figure out when their applications are going to be re-heard. Perhaps you'd need a system to track when the AAS numbers are up for hearing.

From my admittedly unreasearched POV, I don't think it is in principle a barrier to object even without knowing the applicants' identities. The gist of the objection would be their conduct in cheating, as reported in the judgment and the news, in that they are not fit and proper persons. If anything, this shows that your objection is not driven by personal animus but by objective facts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
advocate, law, lawyer, legal, solicitor

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From Lawyer Insider: Life is Glamorous but Unsatisfying Salary.sg Income and Jobs 31 15-01-2018 12:40 PM

» 30 Recent Threads
How is life as a doctor in... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
8,521 Replies, 3,927,912 Views
Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
20,928 Replies, 6,199,706 Views
MAS for Mid Career Professionals ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
2,544 Replies, 1,304,070 Views
NUS (National University of... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
350 Replies, 381,471 Views
LTA (Land Transport Authority) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,062 Replies, 583,364 Views
DSTA (under Mindef) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,779 Replies, 1,631,110 Views
GovTech ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
6,968 Replies, 2,924,193 Views
Hospital (Private or Public)... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,297 Replies, 617,336 Views
Civil Servant Year-End Bonus
9 Replies, 2,732 Views
Career as Teacher ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
12,194 Replies, 7,710,504 Views
HTX (Home Team Science and... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,063 Replies, 570,807 Views
PSA International ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
128 Replies, 121,189 Views
CSA (Cyber Security Agency) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,054 Replies, 641,480 Views
Civil Svc/ Statboard - Typical... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
7,018 Replies, 4,287,063 Views
MINDEF DXO (All FAQ on it) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
6,385 Replies, 5,216,385 Views
Roles in accenture singapore ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
8,367 Replies, 2,792,511 Views
Civil Service Pay - Director level ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
169 Replies, 408,760 Views
HSBC Bank ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
69 Replies, 130,846 Views
Queries about Cpib application ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,431 Replies, 986,252 Views
Lawyer Salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
21,799 Replies, 11,478,396 Views
merit increment in civil service ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
288 Replies, 340,571 Views
Compare civil service salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
16,710 Replies, 13,577,430 Views
NTU (non-faculty) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
193 Replies, 250,782 Views
OKX SuperNova Graduate Program ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
249 Replies, 143,585 Views
How much are you earning per annum? ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
14,459 Replies, 7,002,521 Views
Civil Service Performance Bonus ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
5,521 Replies, 5,189,969 Views
Work culture in IHiS ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
860 Replies, 657,975 Views
ST Electronics ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
4,075 Replies, 1,840,619 Views
Like, share and subscribe
0 Replies, 142 Views
ITE (lecturer) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
297 Replies, 438,635 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2