Unregistered |
22-02-2016 11:39 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
(Post 80167)
Overpaid for the value they create. I mean, what's the value-add of bankers. They facilitate flow of credit and other stuff needed for an economy to function, granted, but some of the activities, like trading, what is the value-add? Not to mention the destruction wrought on the financial system and the real economy from some of these activities. Just look at the Lehman Brothers debacle. Banks may not be a monopoly, but they are protected nonetheless, to the extent that the obstacles to entry are imposed by the authorities. In an efficient market, outsized profits should attract competitors and new entrants, but you don't see that happening. Bank licences are regulated.
|
banks move money from the have to the have-nots, driving trade and making the economy.
a bank in sg can lend $ to a bank in myanmar for them to invest in their local businesses. trading of paper derivatives enable money to flow - SQ buys a hedge on petrol prices in order to ensure that they dont suffer when oil prices go up.
banks are profitable solely because they dont have need for inventory or raw materials or research. in other industries, companies have to invest in the long term growth by paying phd holders to do research to better their products - banks dont.
as a result, the only commodity that banks trade, really is brain power. hence, employees are fairly compensated for the longer working hours.
|