First things 1st:

High chance that STB AM =/= NCSS AM. One is a sb under the more atas MTI while the other is a sb under MSF, a smaller and less well endowed ministry.

Titles don't mean sh*t these days and cs has joined the entire bandwagon of giving fancy inflated titles, taking cue from the finance and pte sectors.

3700 for someone with 2 years exp and 2:2 sounds fair, considering that you're joining the social service sector which isn't that greatly paid to begin with.

Quite surprise TS can be AM with just 2 years experience and 3.7k salary, I remember during my time 15 years ago even if inflated titles still need 5 years to reach AM....

I am one of the interviewers who had interviewed you. We were testing your EQ when we laughed.

there is a formula to derive salary offered, in each individual stat board.

would say that 3.7 is a reasonable, considering that your experience is from private sector.

3.7k also can be call assistant manager!?!? didn't know a quiet place like ncss is also into anyhow giving titles.

To the interviewer --> what are u trying to achieve testing others by laughing at them. I certainly dont do that when i interview candidates. it is downright disrespectful.

Like I said, we are testing EQ of the candidate.

Why are you an assistant manager but paid so lowly? i'm just an analyst with 2.5 industry experience and I'm paid more than you.

I seriously doubt if a Director in a place like NCSS is even comparable to a junior manager in MNCs with more conservative titles.

Dont do that next time. Understand!