Quote:
Either way, you seemed to be more concern about remuneration than anything. Not that there's anything wrong, but to work in healthcare sector, one must have a more "altruistic" outlook towards his/her work and impact beyond self serving needs. |
Quote:
|
If pay matters so much then dont join. Simple as that. Dont make yourself unhappy over the money. To unregistered 12:47, even if more than 3 ppl here contribute their insights, it wont be enough for you wont it?
|
Quote:
|
I'm in one of the healthcare GLC now. The hours are long considering that it's "public" (8am-6:30, 7pm+ for me everyday), their is little direction from the top and much territorial protectionism between the different departments (clinical and non-clinical). Have worked in public sector before and found that we see less of these in established SB compared to the fluid nature of healthcare GLC, especially those with shorter history. Which is ironic since this is the chance to mold the culture to be open and collaborative. The vision and mission which documented these values are seen as a joke and the turnover among support staff is higher than normal. I am not sure of the value of jumping to another healthcare GLC every 2-3 years and it would be good to hear from others whether what I described is a norm in other healthcare GLC.
Good thread so far and would be interesting to hear from others who are working in more established healthcare GLC. |
Quote:
|
Heard healthcare GLCs have lots of office politics. Or at least more than the norm. is that true?
|
Hi anyone working in NHG?
I just want to know if career progression there for corporate side (e.g. HR) is good (i.e. able to make it to AD/DD/D level in time to come), for those coming in as mid-career. How's their annual increment like for average (i.e. C ) performer? Thanks in advance. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2