don't think it is necessarily just 2-3 yrs of experience, although it could be a factor if the working experience is from a field that they are not looking for. If the field is something they want/need, then no of yrs should not be a factor unless they cannot afford to match the compensation

They don't have to know and I don't think they care anyway, probably they're just given some guidelines on what they are looking out for, then the reviewer of the cv will select those matching the requirements. I suppose the hidden requirement is perhaps a good degree class and working experience of less than 3 years.

True also. Nvm time for other job then

I think the matching of compensation here is Abit tricky in the sense that we are unlikely to have relevant experience as this is an investigator role, unless formerly from SPF or something similar. And if your current pay is $6k and your experience is not entirely relevant, then those seniors who are inside and slowly rose through the ranks drawing perhaps 5k or less after 3 years. It's gonna feel so weird for them, someone coming in without experience and drawing more than them. CPIB is investigating corruption, with highly authorised access to any information. It's not something we can learn in the private sector and still be legal.

All the best guys, didn't make it either

Last minute call!!!

Hi I've reached the venue, anyone else?

Let's meet at the tea tray later

Applying others? I submitted my resume to Big4. 😂 Still feeling sad about the rejection. Oh well...

Two things..

1. they are not looking for specific years of experience, but there is a preference for matured applicants

2. there is some obsession over history of alcoholic and substance abuse