|
|
01-04-2023, 10:43 PM
|
|
2019: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2020: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2021: geo3 A (approx +170)
2022: promoted geo4 A (+454)
2023: geo4 C+ (+163)
Fkn stupid. Two As in the two toughest years of my (our) careers, covering KPs who were on study leave, colleagues who were down. Fight so hard during the pandemic and thankfully was recognised by the school's ranking panel.
But the average performing GEO3s that were promoted this year have now sailed past my salary point.
Screw it, I'm done here. Can easily get +40% in the private sector (edu consultancy).
|
01-04-2023, 11:00 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
2019: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2020: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2021: geo3 A (approx +170)
2022: promoted geo4 A (+454)
2023: geo4 C+ (+163)
Fkn stupid. Two As in the two toughest years of my (our) careers, covering KPs who were on study leave, colleagues who were down. Fight so hard during the pandemic and thankfully was recognised by the school's ranking panel.
But the average performing GEO3s that were promoted this year have now sailed past my salary point.
Screw it, I'm done here. Can easily get +40% in the private sector (edu consultancy).
|
imagine an officer 1 year behind you whose ability and performance is below yours.
2020: geo3 C (approx +170)
2021: geo3 C (approx +100)
2022: geo3 B (approx +175), adjustment (approx +450 to 500)
2023: promoted geo4 B (approx +500 to 550)
you seem to be right about the suay outcome?
|
01-04-2023, 11:26 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Yup. As a GEO4, the 5% adjustment was something like 280 or 290. GEO3s all got at least 450.
|
In the same boat here.
2021: G3, B
2022: G3->4, A
2023: G4, B
Despite pulling above weight, colleagues who joined 1 year later and always trailed behind interms of equivalent performance and salary point now draws the same pay as me just after promoting to Geo 4 this year. Verified the numbers as we have all along been open about sharing: one of them felt bad for me.
Apart from the generic email found in intranet, anyway knows where we can give our feedback more effectively?
|
01-04-2023, 11:33 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
2019: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2020: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2021: geo3 A (approx +170)
2022: promoted geo4 A (+454)
2023: geo4 C+ (+163)
Fkn stupid. Two As in the two toughest years of my (our) careers, covering KPs who were on study leave, colleagues who were down. Fight so hard during the pandemic and thankfully was recognised by the school's ranking panel.
But the average performing GEO3s that were promoted this year have now sailed past my salary point.
Screw it, I'm done here. Can easily get +40% in the private sector (edu consultancy).
|
Then leave the service lor. Teachers are aplenty. You are easily replaceable
|
01-04-2023, 11:41 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
GEO 4 to GEO 5, Promotion increment + merit increment about 10.55%. PB grade was A.
|
Congratulations!
|
02-04-2023, 12:06 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Then leave the service lor. Teachers are aplenty. You are easily replaceable
|
Already threw letter, no need to wait for you to give instructions. Last day of service in May. Keep PB + tie up loose ends.
|
02-04-2023, 12:08 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
In the same boat here.
2021: G3, B
2022: G3->4, A
2023: G4, B
Despite pulling above weight, colleagues who joined 1 year later and always trailed behind interms of equivalent performance and salary point now draws the same pay as me just after promoting to Geo 4 this year. Verified the numbers as we have all along been open about sharing: one of them felt bad for me.
Apart from the generic email found in intranet, anyway knows where we can give our feedback more effectively?
|
Besides the generic HR email, if you are a scholar and/or on FLP or whatever, you can also write to TMU.
|
02-04-2023, 12:25 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
2019: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2020: geo3 C+ (approx +190)
2021: geo3 A (approx +170)
2022: promoted geo4 A (+454)
2023: geo4 C+ (+163)
Fkn stupid. Two As in the two toughest years of my (our) careers, covering KPs who were on study leave, colleagues who were down. Fight so hard during the pandemic and thankfully was recognised by the school's ranking panel.
But the average performing GEO3s that were promoted this year have now sailed past my salary point.
Screw it, I'm done here. Can easily get +40% in the private sector (edu consultancy).
|
firstly many believe they make more outside ummm not all make it.
secondly wats ur brilliant solution ? it’s the same wherever n whenever salary revisions are announced. nothing new, it’s cuz u need to up the starting pay
|
02-04-2023, 12:29 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
In the same boat here.
2021: G3, B
2022: G3->4, A
2023: G4, B
Despite pulling above weight, colleagues who joined 1 year later and always trailed behind interms of equivalent performance and salary point now draws the same pay as me just after promoting to Geo 4 this year. Verified the numbers as we have all along been open about sharing: one of them felt bad for me.
Apart from the generic email found in intranet, anyway knows where we can give our feedback more effectively?
|
gosh , such basic feedback is known la. u think this things are done by taking out a pencil n drawing scales on a paper??! it’s prob imputed into a system where model shows everthing. ie relative gainers n losers.
teachers in schools can get A or B but lack basic critical thinking skills
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|