Heard that HR has explored such systems but they know it will invite a lot of backlash. Because such a system if implemented, will need to be pushed across all the leadership positions e.g including VPs (if you don't make it to be P in 2 terms, then you revert but to what?) I think the fairer system will be look at the past grades, if cannot maintain reasonable good grades, then ask to switch track of step down. But any policy the HR implement will send out a signal and it may cause teaching to be less attractive too in the long run, so they need to balance this. So the question is why was there over-recruitment of teachers when mergers of schools should have been projected way in advance?
|
Quote:
Yes say u seo1 then cannot move to vp after six years, the u drop down to geo 5 Or u go master teacher track We cannot have too many jiak Liao bee as our his |
I mean VP can so three terms.
U still cannot move up then revert back to get Now the structure not collegial VP think they god like We must create a dynamic teaching force Succession planning Not because u old, u occupy the position till u 65 |
Guys my suggestion to moe
Hod shld adopt the tenure system of university. Meaning maximum two 3 years term = 6 years In university, u asst professor x 2 terms max. If still cannot promote to assoc prof or get tenure, they sack u or ur contract not renewed Our issues is too many fogies are occupying the hod positions in schools. This severely hinder the upward mobility of the junior education officers Under the revamp system. I termed it moe connect 2020 All new officers start off GEO 1 Every 3 years promote one grade. Max GEO 5. Sh Hod vp and p are appointments. With appointments allowance. They still receive their basic GEO salaries SH max 1 term Hod max 2 term Vp max 3 term P max 4 term If they fail to move up to hod, vp, cluster sup respectively . They will resume their teaching appt at GEO 5. Only cluster sup and above, their grades are substantive and permanent. This way we can have a dynamic workforce. |
Quote:
It's not hard to outshine an underperforming SH as a normal teacher in the department, just saying. If you really think you are more deserving. No need to impose a 1 term limit on SH. |
Quote:
What I'm asking about is - how has the % of grades dictated by the system changed for (a) Pre-covid: % of A ? % of B ? % of C+ ? % of C ? (b) Post-covid: % of A ? % of B ? % of C+ ? % of C ? Feels like asking this in an exam question style makes my question clearer hahaha :) |
Quote:
It's not that you shouldn't desire to do better and desire progression, but come on.. why fight a losing battle? |
Quote:
Slower progression happens in any organisation. Everyone cannot be leaders. Before we enter the ministry/civil service, we should accept that there is such a thing as an accelerated scheme for scholars. It means that within the system, there will be people with slower progression. It’s by design. You don’t have to like it, but you cannot choose to enter the system willingly and THEN complain that it exists. Performance bonuses are to me an extra. I’ve planned my lifestyle based on my salary and not my uncertain bonus (that varies). If i do well, good. If i don't do well, also good. My family, friends, hobbies matter more to me than the endless pursuit of this elusive progression that I have no ultimate control over. If you want fast progression, fat bonuses, a system where retrenchments are common (thats how young and new people replace the old and experienced and well paid folks), there are plenty of such companies out there. Question is: if you take a deep look at yourself, your qualifications, your abilities, your attitude, do you REALLY think you have it to survive/thrive in such a cut-throat environment? Be real. No free lunch in the world. |
For those straddling two departments, is it unlikely that we’ll ever be considered for KP positions in one of those departments? (Eg someone who only teaches one subject in each department)
|
What a joke, some chaps here are. Asking for tenure for HOD. Do you ever think MOE will ever agree to that? In the first place, do you think they have a presence in this forum?
Why would they implement such a policy which shoots themselves in the foot? Don’t ‘own self say, own self happy’ and keep talking along that line. No one ever said anything about changing the system. Learn to live with it. Tuition, shares, etc. |
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2