Quote:
HR seems to be only focused on scholars. Honestly, have seen some who are crappy, but at VP levels only coz they have scholar status. |
Agree with what many of you have mentioned, abt the bottlenecks, abt how non scholars don’t really have opportunities, and many young folks have little chances to progress and have their aspirations fulfilled.
Coupled with how HR is so ‘unfair’ or unclear in practices- only grooming scholars but neglecting the very deserving HODs. Some scholar VPs I’ve seen have poor attitude, lack empathy and really lack substance, yet they are in the positions only because of their status. What happened to meritocracy?! |
Quote:
|
For seniors in ranking panel, how do you guys make a decision on whether to raise an officer's CEP? Just curious about the kind of discussions that take place when determining an officer's future
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Granted it is quite subjective, and it's quite dependent on whether the work is visible enough to everyone on the panel. Being 'strategically deployed' across different committees headed by different KPs is one way to increase visibility. But this also means.. a lot of committees lor. |
Quote:
2008 August contract 2009 NIE 2010 GEO2 (back then it was GEO1.1 I believe) 2011 GEO3 (GEO1A1 back then) 2012 GEO4 (GEO1A2 back then) 2014 GEO5 2019 SEO1 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
nowadays, you don't see 7 promotees in the same subgrade |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2