Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here goes. Take notes alright, wannabe IBD.
The M&A division typically focuses on cash/stock-based acquisitions. LBO models are primarily (and almost exclusively) referring to PE transactions as it typically involves a huge amount of leverage (this is covered by the Sponsors/LevFin groups depending on the type of transaction). Pro-forma essentially means an estimate of how the end-product (either a merger or an acquisition) would look like on paper. Pro-forma BS is definitely needed for M&A modelling, but clients sometimes wish to see the combined forecasted IS and CFS as well. Thus, when you went from a S&T banker to an M&A Banker, it’s extremely funny for you to think that LBO modelling is your core deliverable and only LBOs require pro-forma modelling rofl Have fun in Big 4 alright, & stop acting like you’re in BB FO. It’s really, really embarrassing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"clients sometimes wish to see the combined forecasted" Please just stop pretending you have any clients, your stakeholders are only FO who give **** to you. |
Quote:
Next time just make sure you’re prepared before you pretend to be in FO. It’s really embarrassing. |
Quote:
|
Not sure why this thread became bashing big 4 thread. Did the poster get rejected by some girls in big 4 or what. If not, it must be some ex-big4 guys that had a really unpleasant stay there. I cant believe someone from big consulting firms or banks with no experience in big 4 would spend so much time bashing them here.
I am an ex-big 4 here. Its definitely a decent platform for you to grow your career. Lets be professional here. You can be a high flyer and earning big money but i really dont see why we should put down others on their career choices. |
Quote:
Just stick to Big 4 alright (if you are even in B4). Honestly think you’re way too dumb and cringe even for that lmao |
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2