High Finance Thread

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Also I have grad with FCH so may I ask in what other aspects does an MAS grad lose to one from Temasek/GIC

Agree with above, its the payscale. Just comparing the offers that i got offered from MAS vs a private company doing ECM, my pay in the private company was nearly twice including comps.

Personally find that MAS does not have many exit opportunities.Not too sure about this tho

Originally Posted by Unregistered

MAS is like govt job that pays peanuts compared to proper high finance roles. In general private comp >>>>> public unless you become PM of course

portfolio manager in MAS good? wow never knew that

MAS = back office in local bank aka compliance, risk , dont bring them up ty in this thread thanks

Rule of thumb is see who hires from where -> e.g. if GIC hires from IB means GIC comps IB payscale (or at least has a job security / work life balance that all in compares favourably).

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Enough with the local bank FO, BB BO

May I remind you this is High Finance thread?

We only talk about profession that earns you 10k++/month here

douche....!

Originally Posted by Unregistered

mas does not belong to high finance. Unless you’re on their scholar track, the standard of grads are lower than Temasek/GIC. If you’re studying econs it’s a decent place

I keep Lol when the term High Finance keeps being bandied around.

wtf does high finance even mean

Originally Posted by Unregistered

wtf does high finance even mean

means insurance

high finance = jobs that pay > 10k+ straight out of university.

If you earning > 10k after 8 years in MO or BO - still not considered high finance.

Becuase after 8 years in BB IB the VP would be earning 500k already

Why tf are there so many salty losers

High finance is a legit proper term. Pls google

Just cus you’re a loser who can’t earn enough doesn’t mean others can’t