Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
After reviewing my salary growth for the past 8 years, the following were observed:
a) Merit Increment (MI) is a fixed rate based on performance and CEP.
My increments were the same when I received C in 2013 and 2014
My increments were the same when I received B in 2015 and 2016
b) Promotion Increment is also a fixed rate.
My increments from MX12-MX11 (B) and MX11-MX11A (B) were the same amount.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, MI is based on PERFORMANCE AND CEP (it was in the circular). Assuming my CEP is MX10, I will get higher increment than an officer with a CEP of MX11A even if we are of the same substantive grade and given the same performance grade.
Example:
Officer A (Current Sub Grade MX11; CEP MX10) - Grade B - Increment: $3xx+
Officer B (Current Sub Grade MX11; CEP MX11A) - Grade B - Increment: $2xx+
PS: I happened to know my CEP (and reading from the many posts in this forum) hence the conclusion. Thus, it's a bit pointless to project by % increase as that is not how it calculated... Feel free to disagree.
|
thanks for your insights, my case is a little strange. Got 244 MI for 2014 with a B (mx12).
this year i similarly got a B but the increment was 378 (9%)at Mx12. Is it possible that my cep was reviewed?