Salary.sg Forums - View Single Post - How much are you earning per annum?
View Single Post
  #5123 (permalink)  
Old 19-08-2014, 01:54 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Talking big

For a 31 year old vp/ad in a investment bank making only 260k, you are talking really big. What you described below in para 1 is a sure fire recipe for revolution in x generations. How many houses do you think there are in Europe that every single person can do what you said, buying a house every generation. There has to be a redistribution of wealth at some point in time, which a 99 year leasehold system does.

And for you to criticize those who use leasehold condos as a status symbol sounds real funny to me compared to yourself using 260k pay as a similar status symbol. You could be working like a dog to get that pay while the really rich ones (like those you described as buying house after house for last few generations are shaking their leg).

And for you to even say people on this forum are ignorant and money faced, well you are obviously reading and contributing to this forum and you are quoting your pay 260k ( Wah so much), a vp/ad is nothing special as well just like leasehold condos. So what does that make you? Non ignorant and non money faced?

If you like your superpower home country so much, go comment on your superpower forum and leave us ignorant frogs in wells alone. Why so much angst?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
There's actually very serious ramifications to the oppression, which I'm surprised money-faced people like people here hadn't realised. The big problem with this oppression is that you'll never accrue wealth long term. You'll accrue it short term, but every 2 generations, a reset button is pressed and your descendants lose the equity and start over. Let's use an old enough civilization as an example, eg Europe. Pierre in France owns a house, passes it to his son, who keeps the equity (the equity doesn't fade), his son bought his own house, has a mortgage of his own but inherits Pierre's house, son passes two houses to the grandson (his own and Pierre's) and then the next generation passes three houses, and on and on and on for the next 500 years. This is how the Europeans accrued wealth and got so rich. For people in Asian despotic regimes, Ah Meng passes his mass market 99 year condo to his son, value drop by half by this time. Goes down to nothing and land returns to despot ruling party after his son turns 50. So essentially the wealth and hard earned money Ah Meng built goes down to nothing every 99 years. If you analyze this, you'd learn that it's actually to create a bubble in the economy and for the gov to be the perpetual profiteer. Instead of assets in the hands of the people for them to own and bequeath, the assets ultimately belong to the state. What is this? Oh it's communism.

The gov gets to retain overall rights and resell the land at inflated price after 99 years, but the inflation over the 99 years had nothing to do with the gov, it was the toiling of two generations of Ah Meng's family. Lol.

Second, this ensures there's bubble to keep the economy look like it has value that isn't there. People, to override this, sell their 99 year condos and HDB in a panic after 10 years, to buy a fresh lease, so this keeps the economy buzzing with fake turnover, fake price increases based on face transactions, fair everything. Same as the COE scheme. This country was built on much of what's fake u bet if you had the same system without the fake schemes your real GDP is only half of 200billion.

One Singaporean in order to defend PAP said on Facebook but can ah which buildings last 100 years, you people are crazy, well obviously this frog in the well has never been to Europe where the buildings in downtown are 400 years old!! They renovate the inside which looks as modern as any other building, and keeps the classic historical exterior. That's why people flock to beautiful Europe for vacation. There are castles standing in Europe that are over 400 years old (yes they belong to somebody)!!

Reply With Quote