Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
the very notion of admitting a non-practising lawyer (who does not have a right to practice) is a contradiction in terms, not to mention a hollow exercise.
a lawyer who does not have a right to practise is not a lawyer in any real sense of the word.
this regime sounds exactly like what one would expect policymakers sit around in a room and shuffled words on paper.
|
In-house counsels don’t have active PCs bro, relax lol.
Isn’t one of the reason for all qualified person who has passed Part B to become NP lawyers to push for more career options to cater for those that don’t wanna become practising lawyers?
Administratively, it makes more sense to have all of the qualified persons (mind you, this just means passing law school for local grads) who has passed Part B to just get called to the bar as NP lawyers? As opposed to having these fresh grads decide which path to take straight out of law school (most of which don’t have real working experience).