Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
The way I see it, having two rounds of certification makes sense. You’re called as a lawyer without PC, and then with PC. The alternative you’re suggesting seems to imply the issuance of PC without the need to apply to the courts?
|
the very notion of admitting a non-practising lawyer (who does not have a right to practice) is a contradiction in terms, not to mention a hollow exercise.
a lawyer who does not have a right to practise is not a lawyer in any real sense of the word.
this regime sounds exactly like what one would expect policymakers sit around in a room and shuffled words on paper.