Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Seriously for those who are claiming that ranking is unfair, what would you consider to be fair? In a school, as a teacher you will never have in depth knowledge of what everyone in the school is doing. As an English teacher I sure as hell have no idea what my Maths colleague are doing and whether they are contributing a lot to their dept or outside their school that could justify that person getting a B.
Heck, do any of you know whether your colleagues were nominated by your school leaders for recognition like OYEA even though they were eventually not even in the finalised list?
Seriously, it's very easy to say that everything is unfair from that little knowledge that you have. You think that you do a lot of work and everyone else did less. To the people whining about unfairness, the only fair system to them is the one where they get the good grade.
|
What is fair? This is such a simple question, with simple answers.
But sadly made complicated by people. And many people like you, are brainwashed into learned helplessness, that the current mode of appraisal is the best and fairest option out there.
The objective of appraisal, is basically to determine whether people are pulling their weight. Are they under-performing, performing, or over-performing.
Whether you are performing, can be easily determined by whether you achieved the KPIs assigned to you at the start of the year.
Fail to achieve the KPIs = underperforming
Met the KPIs = performing
Exceeded the KPIs = overperforming
And of course, the KPIs set at the start of each work year has to be reasonable, and can be humanly done within the scope of official work week.
Is this really very hard to do?