Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
All the talk about scholar vs non-scholars made me realise that some are rally disillusioned. I am a farmer, consistent A and B since the day I joined the school more than a decade ago, and I can safely tell you that paths of scholars are mapped out, and because of that, perf grades and cep are also ingeniously crafted to ensure that they are accelerated on their path to take on SLship or high leadership roles in HQ. They do not even need to assume the role of hod to move up to VP, simply appearing and disappearing between schools and HQ and somehow they are magically transformed into one ready for higher appointments.
While I consistently performed well in school and have tried out every single possible roles that brought about school/cluster/national impact, promotion came much slower. Cep… ultimately still basing it on paper qualification. Discussion about SLship was met with smokescreen, since many SLs themselves do not have good capabilities to develop people. A number of my friends (hod from different schools) face similar predicament. Career hod…what can we do?
|
Got
PSC/OMS scholars who promote every 2 years like clockwork.
2 years as BT, 2 years as AD in SM/HQ, 2 years as HOD in school, 2 year as VP. After 8 years become P, become some of the youngest P by 30s.
Quite ridiculous how someone with 4 years of teaching (2 years of BT-ship and 2 years as offloaded HOD) can run a school.
And all these are determined by A level results and the scholarship panel interview at 18 years old.