Quote:
Originally Posted by Bean
please provide info on your bro-in-law:
-What class of degree, from what university
-How much is his basic salary in SIAEC?
-How many years of exp?
I am sure that the $4500 = basic + allowance + OT/shift allowance
|
1. He got second class lower from SIM
2. His basic is 4K
3. 10 years
Just to hightlight the different between EX-Airforce and Commercial LAE
1. Those Ex Airforce guys, their background are ex-technician or specialist from their own squardon. THEY ARE NOT THE REAL DEAL because they specialise in military planes.
2. They don't need to sign CRS (Certificate Release of Service) when they completed the job.
3. They didn't attend formal training from SAR 147 training organisation. They went to airforce school to learn the "DIY" trade themselves. In other words, they are mechanics and not professional!!!!
4. Those
ITE aerospace lecturers inside the aerospace section are ex-airforce personnel which are Lazy and insufficent knowledge people. That are the reasons, their parents company release them from their service so no choice they ended in
ITE to teach the students!!!
5. Those ex-airforce people cannot find any career paths to venture. Only LAE are the only people in the aviation are the most sought after.
6. Trust me, many of them apply with SIAEC but cannot get the apprenticeship because they fail their IQ test.
7. Beside SIAEC, many aviation pay good money to LAE because they hold
CAAS licence.
8. My bro in law want to teach because he want to guide the students in the correct direction how to achieve their DREAMS to become LAE. Of course
ITE has to pay GOOD Money to bring in our local talents from their specialise industry.
9. I don't believe that ex-airforce gettting higher salary than LAE.
PAY PEANUTS and U will see monkey running around in the campus.
Cheer to my another 5 cents of advise. I am not against Ex-Airforce people. I commenting on the unfair recruitment drive strategy which wasting our money and rob our students' future due to monkeys teaching.