Salary.sg Forums - View Single Post - Compare civil service salary
View Single Post
  #801 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2011, 07:38 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default rentior construct

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Absolutely would care to share.

1) Short work days and work week (9-hour day, 5-day week) may not always apply in DSTA, especially if you deal with software.


2) Not true that your skills will be irrelevant. In each industry, there will always be some skills that are generic and can be ported across to another company.

It is up to the individual to look after his own as well as his company's interests. That is, while you are deciding on/ fulfilling your business objectives, bear in mind you need to develop yourself professionally. There will be ways to do that.


3) I'm afraid it may be the case that your base salary could indeed be <5K after 5 years given you'll be starting at 3.3K.
I am of the opinion that the base is important, but some companies (your second company) look at the total annual compensation. So, the other pay components come into play. And in DSTA, the other components are decent.

By the way, 3.3K for 2nd lower... Has this been stagnant for close to 2 years? Or even decreased?

In DSTA, most will not be filthy rich.
But they will not let you starve.
Hi, thanks for sharing !

1) Hmmm ok, but it will still be better then the shipyard where i was advised to be prepared for 7 days work week with both weekends ending at 3-4pm.
2) Good point, will bear this in mind and look out to upgrade these generic skills.
3) Will definitely ask the HR side about the salary cap , more details on the progression route (they only said that it depends on work performance during my interview) and also the exact compensation when they contact me again.

If i remembered correctly, i saw a poster mentioned he joined them in late 09 and his starting was similar to 08 levels. Hopefully their '11 level will get a slight boost upwards
Post #118 (https://forums.salary.sg/income-jobs/....html#post6821)

Reply With Quote